Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of crop establishment and weed management practices on growth and yield of wheat

Manoj Kumar; Dibakar Ghosh; Raghwendra Singh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2012–13 and 201314 at ICAR-DWR, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, to study the effect of crop establishment and weed management practices on growth and yield of wheat. Maximum reduction in density and biomass of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana was recorded under zero-tillage with residue while in Medicago denticulata under conventional tillage practices. Zero tillage with residue retention recorded higher grain and straw yield as well as net return and B:C ratio. Among the different herbicides ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (32 g/ha) significantly reduced weed density and dry biomass accumulation, and which was followed by application of mesosulfuron +iodosulfuron and mertibuzin over weedy check due to enhanced of growth, yield and benefit cost ratio of wheat. As compared to weedy, the higher yield attribute character and yield of wheat was produced with the herbicidal treatments. The maximum yield, net return and B:C was achieved with the postemergence application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue most reduced Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana density and biomass.

Treatment
zero-tillage with residuee0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Second interactor
Avena ludovicianaAvena sterilis subsp. ludovicianae0weed
Outcome
density and biomass of Phalaris minor and Avena ludovicianae0
Direction
Maximum reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · Second interactorMarie PORTAS · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum reduction in density and biomass of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana was recorded under zero-tillage with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage most reduced Medicago denticulata.

Treatment
conventional tillage practicese0
Interactor
Medicago denticulatae0weed
Outcome
Medicago denticulatae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“in Medicago denticulata under conventional tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention raised grain and straw yield, net return and benefit to cost ratio.

Treatment
Zero tillage with residue retentione0
Outcome
grain and straw yield as well as net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zero tillage with residue retention recorded higher grain and straw yield as well as net return and B:C ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron reduced weed density and biomass.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (32 g/ha)e0
Outcome
weed density and dry biomass accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (32 g/ha) significantly reduced weed density and dry biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments increased wheat yield attributes and yield relative to the weedy condition.

Treatment
herbicidal treatmentse0
Outcome
yield attribute character and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“As compared to weedy, the higher yield attribute character and yield of wheat was produced with the herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron achieved maximum yield, net return and benefit to cost ratio.

Treatment
postemergence application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfurone0
Outcome
yield, net return and B:Ce0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield, net return and B:C was achieved with the postemergence application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1090 · show in text ↑

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

tillage · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 19 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.