Paper · 1960 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Bitter pit in the apple variety Cleopatra in Tasmania in relation to calcium and magnesium

D Martin; TL Lewis; J Cerny

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

When spray treatments were applied to half-trees of Cleopatra apples, it was shown that magnesium nitrate increased the incidence of pit and calcium nitrate decreased it. There was a suggestion that borax decreased the effectiveness of the calcium nitrate treatment. Magnesium or calcium nitrate, with or without borax, did not affect the potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, or nitrogen content of the fruit cortex. Calcium nitrate in 1959 increased the calcium content but magnesium nitrate had no effect. There was no significant difference in the content of potassium, magnesium, or phosphorus between 1958 and 1959, but the calcium content was 3.3 times as high in 1958. Pit incidence was low in 1958 and high in 1959. No significant difference in content of these four elements could be demonstrated between sound and pitted fruits. The results support the view that calcium is the critical element in pit incidence and that magnesium may play an important part.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium nitrate sprays increased bitter pit incidence.

Treatment
magnesium nitratee0
Outcome
incidence of pite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium nitrate increased the incidence of pit and calcium nitrate decreased it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays decreased bitter pit incidence.

Treatment
calcium nitratee0
Outcome
incidence of pite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium nitrate increased the incidence of pit and calcium nitrate decreased it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borax may have reduced the effectiveness of calcium nitrate against bitter pit.

Treatment
boraxe0
Outcome
effectiveness of the calcium nitrate treatmente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
calcium nitrate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a suggestion that borax decreased the effectiveness of the calcium nitrate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium or calcium nitrate, with or without borax, did not affect potassium, magnesium, phosphorus or nitrogen in fruit cortex.

Treatment
Magnesium or calcium nitrate, with or without boraxe0
Outcome
potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, or nitrogen content of the fruit cortexe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium or calcium nitrate, with or without borax, did not affect the potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, or nitrogen content of the fruit cortex.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate increased fruit calcium content in 1959.

Treatment
Calcium nitratee0
Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1959e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium nitrate in 1959 increased the calcium content but magnesium nitrate had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium nitrate did not affect calcium content in 1959.

Treatment
magnesium nitratee0
Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium nitrate in 1959 increased the calcium content but magnesium nitrate had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit cortex potassium, magnesium and phosphorus content did not differ significantly between 1958 and 1959.

Outcome
content of potassium, magnesium, or phosphoruse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
1958 and 1959e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in the content of potassium, magnesium, or phosphorus between 1958 and 1959”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium content was 3.3 times higher in 1958 than in 1959.

Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
as highe0
Value
3.3 timese0
Qualifier
1958e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the calcium content was 3.3 times as high in 1958.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitter pit incidence was low in 1958 and high in 1959.

Outcome
Pit incidencee0
Direction
low in 1958 and high in 1959e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pit incidence was low in 1958 and high in 1959.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four measured mineral contents did not differ significantly between sound and pitted fruit.

Outcome
content of these four elementse0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Comparator
sound and pitted fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference in content of these four elements could be demonstrated between sound and pitted fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple variety Cleopatra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑

calcium nitrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

calcium nitrate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.