Paper · 2011 · Molecular Plant Pathology

The FRP1 F‐box gene has different functions in sexuality, pathogenicity and metabolism in three fungal pathogens

WILFRIED JONKERS; JAN A. L. VAN KAN; PATRICK TIJM; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant-pathogenic fungi employ a variety of infection strategies; as a result, fungi probably rely on different sets of proteins for successful infection. The F-box protein Frp1, only present in filamentous fungi belonging to the Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Dothideomycetes, is required for nonsugar carbon catabolism and pathogenicity in the root-infecting fungus Fusarium oxysporum. To assess the role of Frp1 in other plant-pathogenic fungi, FRP1 deletion mutants were generated in Fusarium graminearum and Botrytis cinerea, and their phenotypes were analysed. Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts. Deletion of BcFRP1 in B. cinerea did not show any effect on pathogenicity. Sexual reproduction, however, was impaired in both F. graminearum and B. cinerea FRP1 deletion mutants. The mutants of all three fungi displayed different phenotypes when grown on an array of carbon sources. The F. oxysporum and B. cinerea deletion mutants showed opposite growth phenotypes on sugar and nonsugar carbon sources. Replacement of FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with the B. cinerea BcFRP1 resulted in the restoration of pathogenicity, but also in a switch from impaired growth on nonsugar carbon sources to impaired growth on sugar carbon sources. This effect could be ascribed in part to the B. cinerea BcFRP1 promoter sequence. In conclusion, the function of the F-box protein Frp1, despite its high sequence conservation, is not conserved between different fungi, leading to differential requirements for pathogenicity and carbon source utilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deleting FgFRP1 in F. graminearum impaired infection of barley roots.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearume1
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Gene
FgFRP1e1
Outcome
infection of barley rootse1
Direction
impairede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deleting FgFRP1 in F. graminearum did not reduce infection of aerial plant parts.

Organ / stage
aerial plant partse1
Treatment
Deletion of FgFRP1e1
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Outcome
infectione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deleting BcFRP1 in B. cinerea had no detectable effect on pathogenicity.

Treatment
Deletion of BcFRP1 in B. cinereae2
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae2pathogen
Gene
BcFRP1e2
Outcome
pathogenicitye2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“Deletion of BcFRP1 in B. cinerea did not show any effect on pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FRP1 deletion impaired sexual reproduction in F. graminearum.

Treatment
FRP1 deletion mutantse3
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume3pathogen
Outcome
Sexual reproductione3
Direction
impairede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sexual reproduction, however, was impaired in both F. graminearum and B. cinerea FRP1 deletion mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FRP1 deletion impaired sexual reproduction in B. cinerea.

Treatment
FRP1 deletion mutantse3
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae3pathogen
Outcome
Sexual reproductione3
Direction
impairede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sexual reproduction, however, was impaired in both F. graminearum and B. cinerea FRP1 deletion mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F. oxysporum and B. cinerea deletion mutants showed opposite growth phenotypes on sugar and nonsugar carbon sources.

Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume5pathogen
Second interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae5pathogen
Outcome
growth phenotypes on sugar and nonsugar carbon sourcese5
Qualifier
oppositee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e5

“The F. oxysporum and B. cinerea deletion mutants showed opposite growth phenotypes on sugar and nonsugar carbon sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion mutants of all three fungi showed different phenotypes when grown on an array of carbon sources.

Outcome
different phenotypes when grown on an array of carbon sourcese4
Qualifier
all three fungie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e4

“The mutants of all three fungi displayed different phenotypes when grown on an array of carbon sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with BcFRP1 from B. cinerea restored pathogenicity.

Treatment
Replacement of FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with the B. cinerea BcFRP1e6
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume6pathogen
Gene
BcFRP1e6
Outcome
pathogenicitye6
Direction
restoratione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e6

“Replacement of FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with the B. cinerea BcFRP1 resulted in the restoration of pathogenicity, but also in a switch from impaired growth on nonsugar carbon sources to impaired growth on sugar carbon sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same replacement shifted F. oxysporum growth from impaired on nonsugar carbon sources to impaired on sugar carbon sources.

Treatment
Replacement of FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with the B. cinerea BcFRP1e6
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume6pathogen
Outcome
growth on sugar carbon sourcese6
Direction
switche6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e6

“Replacement of FoFRP1 in F. oxysporum with the B. cinerea BcFRP1 resulted in the restoration of pathogenicity, but also in a switch from impaired growth on nonsugar carbon sources to impaired growth on sugar carbon sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1307 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The changed carbon-source growth phenotype may be partly due to the BcFRP1 promoter sequence.

Gene
BcFRP1 promoter sequencee7
Outcome
This effecte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e7

“This effect could be ascribed in part to the B. cinerea BcFRP1 promoter sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1389 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The function of Frp1 is not conserved between different fungi.

Gene
Frp1e7
Outcome
function of the F-box protein Frp1e7
Qualifier
not conserved between different fungie7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Deletion of FgFRP1 in F. graminearum led to impaired infection of barley roots, but not of aerial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e7

“the function of the F-box protein Frp1, despite its high sequence conservation, is not conserved between different fungi, leading to differential requirements for pathogenicity and carbon source utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1612 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · Fusarium graminearum · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

loss of function · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 12 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

loss of function · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.