Paper · 2015 · EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)

Effects of rice husk compost application on soil quality parameters in greenhouse conditions

Zeynep Demir; Coşkun Gülser

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
70
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Effects of rice husk compost (RHC) on some soil quality parameters under greenhouse conditions were investigated. Experiment were conducted in a randomized plot design with different application doses of RHC (0, 3, 6 and 9%) into surface soil (0-20 cm) with three replications in a greenhouse of Agricultural Faculty in Ondokuz Mays University. RHC application generally improved the soil quality parameters according to the control treatment during the experiment carried out with growing tomato plant in the greenhouse in 2010. The soil organic matter (OM) contents significantly increased by the application of RHC in the following order; 9%>6%>3%>0%. While RHC applications in the greenhouses significantly reduced pH contents of soils according to the control, the RHC application increased the values of respiration rate (CO2), EC, NO3-N and available phosphorus (P). While the exchangeable Ca values of soils generally decreased, the exchangeable Mg and K values generally increased according to the control with RHC application. Bulk density (BD) values in the greenhouse were reduced with RHC application doses in the following order 0%>3%> 6%>9%. The values of field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP) and available water capacity (AWC) generally increased according to the control with the application of RHC dosses in the following order 9%>6%>3%. The highest positive correlations among the physical, chemical and biological properties were found between OM and PWP (0.924**), AWC and FC (0.907**), OM and FC (0.897**), CO2 and PWP (0.862**), PWP and FC (0.791**); while the highest negative correlations were found between BD and FC (-0.854**), BD and PWP (-0.871**), BD and OM (-0.868**), BD and CO2 (-0.838**), BD and P (-0.821**), Ca and FC (-0.812**). The highest tomato yield (7.77 ton/da) was obtained with the 9% of RHC application. RHC application to the soil in greenhouse generally improved soil quality and tomato yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk compost increased soil organic matter, ordered 9% > 6% > 3% > 0%.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
application of RHCe0
Outcome
soil organic matter (OM) contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
9%>6%>3%>0%e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil organic matter (OM) contents significantly increased by the application of RHC in the following order; 9%>6%>3%>0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC reduced greenhouse soil pH relative to control.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
RHC applicationse0
Outcome
pH contents of soilse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RHC applications in the greenhouses significantly reduced pH contents of soils according to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC increased soil respiration rate, EC and NO3-N.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
RHC applicatione0
Outcome
respiration rate (CO2), EC, NO3-Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RHC application increased the values of respiration rate (CO2), EC, NO3-N and available phosphorus (P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC increased soil available phosphorus.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
RHC applicatione0
Outcome
available phosphorus (P)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RHC application increased the values of respiration rate (CO2), EC, NO3-N and available phosphorus (P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC generally decreased exchangeable soil Ca.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
RHC applicatione1
Outcome
exchangeable Ca values of soilse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exchangeable Ca values of soils generally decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“with RHC application. Bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1049 · show in text ↑
e2

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC generally increased exchangeable soil Mg and K relative to control.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
RHC applicatione0
Outcome
exchangeable Mg and K valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the exchangeable Mg and K values generally increased according to the control with RHC application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC reduced soil bulk density, ordered 0% > 3% > 6% > 9%.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
RHC application dosese0
Outcome
Bulk density (BD) valuese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
0%>3%> 6%>9%e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density (BD) values in the greenhouse were reduced with RHC application doses in the following order 0%>3%> 6%>9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RHC generally increased field capacity, permanent wilting point and available water capacity.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
application of RHC dossese0
Outcome
field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP) and available water capacity (AWC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
9%>6%>3%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP) and available water capacity (AWC) generally increased according to the control with the application of RHC dosses in the following order 9%>6%>3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1369 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest tomato yield, 7.77 ton/da, occurred with 9% RHC.

Treatment
9% of RHC applicatione0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.77 ton/dae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest tomato yield (7.77 ton/da) was obtained with the 9% of RHC application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1863 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Oryza sativa · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Oryza sativa · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.