Paper · 2021 · Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and fertilization rates optimize tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growth and yield in a Mediterranean agroecosystem

Hana Ziane; Nabila Hamza; Amel Meddad-Hamza

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) allow plants to make better use of water and minerals. This alliance concerns the majority of crops and might greatly limit their dependence on fertilizers. In this work, AMF contribution and moderate fertilization were assessed for their impact on root colonization, growth, yield, number of fruits and soluble dry matter of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Fahla F1) in a Mediterranean agroecosystem (El-Tarf, Algeria). The soil had a low available phosphorus content and a low mycorrhizal potential. Tomato seedlings were uninoculated (M−) or inoculated (M+) with a commercial AMF inoculum. Three NPK (10.42.10) fertilizer rates corresponding to 0, 2000 and 4000 mg plant−1 were applied. Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%). NPK decreased root colonization levels; however, it enhanced significantly tomato growth with the highest shoot dry biomass obtained with 2000 mg plant -1. Total yield and number of fruits increased with increasing NPK rate; the highest yield occurred with 4000 mg plant−1. Soluble dry matter was not affected by AMF or NPK. Tomato inoculation combined to a reduced fertilization can provide appreciable gains in terms of growth and yield in a low P soil with a low mycorrhizal potential, which enhances agricultural sustainability due to a decreased impact of fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil had low available phosphorus.

Outcome
soil had a low available phosphorus contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil had a low available phosphorus content and a low mycorrhizal potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased tomato root colonization by 48%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
root colonization levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased tomato height by 8.78%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot dry biomass by 21.5%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased root dry biomass by 34.45%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
root dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased total tomato yield by 8.07%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased number of tomato fruits by 19.05%.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root colonization levels (+48%), height (+8.78%), shoot dry biomass (+21.5%), root dry biomass (+34.45%), total yield (+8.07%) and number of fruits (+19.05%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilization decreased tomato root colonization.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
root colonization levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK decreased root colonization levels;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK significantly increased tomato growth, with highest shoot dry biomass at 2000 mg per plant.

Treatment
2000 mg plant -1e0
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced significantly tomato growth with the highest shoot dry biomass obtained with 2000 mg plant -1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield increased as NPK rate increased, peaking at 4000 mg per plant.

Treatment
4000 mg plant−1e0
Outcome
Total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield and number of fruits increased with increasing NPK rate; the highest yield occurred with 4000 mg plant−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number increased as NPK rate increased.

Treatment
NPK ratee0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield and number of fruits increased with increasing NPK rate;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and NPK did not affect soluble dry matter.

Treatment
AMF or NPKe0
Outcome
Soluble dry mattere0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble dry matter was not affected by AMF or NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend tomato inoculation with reduced fertilization in low P soil.

Outcome
inoculation combined to a reduced fertilization can provide appreciable gains in terms of growth and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato inoculation combined to a reduced fertilization can provide appreciable gains in terms of growth and yield in a low P soil with a low mycorrhizal potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1424 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

65 papers: 59 positive, 6 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.