Paper · 2020 · HortTechnology

Effects of Nutrient Solution Management and Environment on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics

Elisa Solis-Toapanta; Paul R. Fisher; Celina Gómez

13
claims
35
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Interest in hydroponic home gardening has increased in recent years. However, research is lacking on minimum inputs required to consistently produce fresh produce using small-scale hydroponic systems for noncommercial purposes. Our objectives were to 1) evaluate the effect of biweekly nutrient solution replacements (W) vs. biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O) on final growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of hydroponic tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) plants grown in a greenhouse, and 2) characterize growth over time in a greenhouse or an indoor environment using W. For each environment, ‘Bush Goliath’ tomato plants were grown for 12 weeks in 6.5-gal hydroponic systems. The experiment was replicated twice over time. In the greenhouse, plants were exposed to the following day/night temperature, relative humidity (RH), and daily light integral (DLI) in 2018 (mean ± SD): 31 ± 6/22 ± 2 °C, 67% ± 8%, and 32.4 ± 7 mol·m ‒2 ·d ‒1 ; and in 2019: 28 ± 6/22 ± 3 °C, 68% ± 5%, and 27.7 ± 6 mol·m ‒2 ·d ‒1 . For both experimental runs indoors, the day/night temperature, RH, and DLI were 21 ± 2 °C, 60% ± 4%, and 20 ± 2 mol·m ‒2 ·d ‒1 provided by broadband white light-emitting diode lamps. The W/O treatment resulted in a higher-than-desired electrical conductivity (EC) and total nutrient concentration by the end of the experiment. In addition, compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight. Nonetheless, the final concentration of all nutrients was almost completely depleted at week 12 under W, suggesting that the applied fertilizer concentration could be increased as fruiting occurs. Surprisingly, shoot biomass, leaf area, and leaf number followed a linear trend over time in both environments. Nonetheless, given the higher DLI and temperature, greenhouse-grown plants produced 4 to 5 kg more of fruit than those grown indoors, but fruit from plants grown indoors were unaffected by blossom-end-rot. Our findings indicate that recommendations for nutrient solution management strategies should consider specific crop needs, growing environments, and production goals by home gardeners.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment resulted in a higher-than-desired electrical conductivity and total nutrient concentration by the end of the experiment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
electrical conductivity (EC) and total nutrient concentratione1
Direction
higher-than-desirede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W/O treatment resulted in a higher-than-desired electrical conductivity (EC) and total nutrient concentration by the end of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment gave less leaf area than the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
leaf areae2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment gave more shoot growth than the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
shoot growthe2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment gave less water uptake than the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
water uptakee2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment gave a similar fruit number to the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
fruit numbere2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment increased blossom-end-rot incidence in tomato compared with the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
blossom-end-rot incidencee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment delayed fruit ripening compared with the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge2
Direction
delayede2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W/O treatment gave lower fruit fresh weight than the W treatment.

Treatment
biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacemente0
Outcome
fruit fresh weighte2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
the W treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“biweekly fertilizer addition without a nutrient solution replacement (W/O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the W treatment, W/O resulted in less leaf area, more shoot growth, less water uptake, and similar fruit number—but increased blossom-end-rot incidence, delayed fruit ripening, and lower fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under biweekly nutrient solution replacement, the final concentration of all nutrients was almost completely depleted at week 12.

Treatment
biweekly nutrient solution replacementse6
Outcome
final concentration of all nutrientse3
Direction
depletede3
Qualifier
at week 12e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“the final concentration of all nutrients was almost completely depleted at week 12 under W, suggesting that the applied fertilizer concentration could be increased as fruiting occurs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1800 · show in text ↑
e6

“biweekly nutrient solution replacements (W)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–320 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The applied fertilizer concentration could be increased as fruiting occurs.

Outcome
the applied fertilizer concentration could be increasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“the final concentration of all nutrients was almost completely depleted at week 12 under W, suggesting that the applied fertilizer concentration could be increased as fruiting occurs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass, leaf area and leaf number followed a linear trend over time in both environments.

Outcome
shoot biomass, leaf area, and leaf numbere4
Qualifier
followed a linear trend over timee4
Setting
both environmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Surprisingly, shoot biomass, leaf area, and leaf number followed a linear trend over time in both environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse-grown tomato plants produced 4 to 5 kg more fruit than plants grown indoors.

Treatment
greenhouse-grown plantse5
Outcome
fruite5
Direction
moree5
Value
4 to 5 kge5
Comparator
those grown indoorse5
Setting
greenhousee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“greenhouse-grown plants produced 4 to 5 kg more of fruit than those grown indoors, but fruit from plants grown indoors were unaffected by blossom-end-rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from tomato plants grown indoors was unaffected by blossom-end-rot, unlike greenhouse-grown plants.

Treatment
plants grown indoorse5
Outcome
blossom-end-rote5
Direction
unaffectede5
Comparator
greenhouse-grown plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“greenhouse-grown plants produced 4 to 5 kg more of fruit than those grown indoors, but fruit from plants grown indoors were unaffected by blossom-end-rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2118 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 850 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.