Abstract
To better understand movement of systemic fungicides in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments. Basipetal leaves and pods on the same branch with the treated leaves were sequentially numbered from 1 to 3, with 1 being closest to treated foliage. These nontreated tissues, with newly formed terminal leaves, were sampled 4, 8, and 12 days after treatment for bioassay with Sclerotium rolfsii. All fungicides protected new acropetal leaves while prothioconazole + tebuconazole also provided some inhibition of S. rolfsii in nontreated basipetal leaves but no fungicide protected pods. In the greenhouse, applications of prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole (Proline, 0.18 kg a.i./ha) to main stems of 'Georgia Green' provided some protection to leaves from nontreated cotyledonary branches sampled 14 days after last treatment but S. rolfsii was not inhibited on nontreated roots, stems, or pods. The results demonstrate acropetal protection by all fungicides evaluated, and indicate that prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole applied to foliage can sometimes reduce diseases in the lower, nontreated portions of the plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
All fungicides applied to terminal peanut leaves protected new acropetal leaves relative to nontreated tissues in field experiments.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Material
- Tifrunnere1
- Organ / stage
- new acropetal leavese2
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha)e1
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie3pathogen - Outcome
- protected new acropetal leavese2
- Comparator
- nontreated tissuese3
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e2“All fungicides protected new acropetal leaves”
e3“These nontreated tissues, with newly formed terminal leaves, were sampled 4, 8, and 12 days after treatment for bioassay with Sclerotium rolfsii”
Claim · model-written summary
Prothioconazole + tebuconazole provided some inhibition of Sclerotium rolfsii in nontreated basipetal peanut leaves.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Organ / stage
- basipetal leavese4
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazolee4
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie4pathogen
- Outcome
- inhibition of S. rolfsii in nontreated basipetal leavese4
- Qualifier
- somee4
- Comparator
- nontreated tissuese3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e3“These nontreated tissues, with newly formed terminal leaves, were sampled 4, 8, and 12 days after treatment for bioassay with Sclerotium rolfsii”
e4“prothioconazole + tebuconazole also provided some inhibition of S. rolfsii in nontreated basipetal leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
No fungicide protected peanut pods from Sclerotium rolfsii bioassay.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Organ / stage
- podse5
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha)e1
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie3pathogen
- Outcome
- protected podse5
- Comparator
- nontreated tissuese3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e3“These nontreated tissues, with newly formed terminal leaves, were sampled 4, 8, and 12 days after treatment for bioassay with Sclerotium rolfsii”
e5“no fungicide protected pods”
Claim · model-written summary
Prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole applied to main stems of peanut provided some protection to leaves in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Material
- Georgia Greene6
- Organ / stage
- leavese6
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazolee6
- Outcome
- protection to leavese6
- Comparator
- nontreated cotyledonary branchese6
- Setting
- greenhousee6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e6“In the greenhouse, applications of prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole (Proline, 0.18 kg a.i./ha) to main stems of 'Georgia Green' provided some protection to leaves from nontreated cotyledonary branches sampled 14 days after last treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Sclerotium rolfsii was not inhibited on nontreated peanut roots, stems or pods after greenhouse application of prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Organ / stage
- roots, stems, or podse7
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazolee6
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie7pathogen
- Outcome
- inhibitede7
- Comparator
- nontreatede7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e6“In the greenhouse, applications of prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole (Proline, 0.18 kg a.i./ha) to main stems of 'Georgia Green' provided some protection to leaves from nontreated cotyledonary branches sampled 14 days after last treatment”
e7“S. rolfsii was not inhibited on nontreated roots, stems, or pods”
Claim · model-written summary
Prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole applied to peanut foliage can sometimes reduce diseases in the lower, nontreated portions of the plant.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole applied to foliagee2
- Outcome
- diseasese2
- Direction
- reducee2
- Qualifier
- can sometimese2
- Comparator
- nontreated portions of the plante2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“three terminal, fully expanded leaves of primary lateral branches of 'Tifrunner' peanut were treated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole (Provost, 0.29 kg a.i./ha), azoxystrobin (Abound, 0.31 kg a.i./ha), or flutolanil (Moncut, 0.79 kg a.i./ha) in field experiments”
e2“prothioconazole + tebuconazole or prothioconazole applied to foliage can sometimes reduce diseases in the lower, nontreated portions of the plant”
The same questions in other papers
prothioconazole · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
prothioconazole · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →tebuconazole · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →tebuconazole · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →tebuconazole · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →prothioconazole · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
azoxystrobin · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →flutolanil · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.