Paper · 2000 · Peanut Science

Use of Azoxystrobin for Disease Control in Texas Peanut

W. J. Grichar; B. A. Besler; A. J. Jaks

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Field studies were conducted at 11 locations across south Texas from 1994 to 1997 to determine the activity of azoxystrobin against southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.), Rhizoctonia pod rot (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn), early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola Hori) and late leaf spot [Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & Curt.) Deighton]. Azoxystrobin at 0.22 to 0.45 kg/ha applied twice provided control of stem rot, Rhizoctonia pod rot, and leaf spot comparable to tebuconazole at 0.2 kg/ha applied four times. Peanut yield increases were evident with all fungicide treatments over the untreated check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin applied twice gave control of peanut stem rot, Rhizoctonia pod rot and leaf spot comparable to tebuconazole applied four times

Treatment
Azoxystrobin at 0.22 to 0.45 kg/ha applied twicee1
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
control of stem rot, Rhizoctonia pod rot, and leaf spote1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
tebuconazole at 0.2 kg/ha applied four timese1
Setting
south Texase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Second interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Texas Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field studies were conducted at 11 locations across south Texas from 1994 to 1997 to determine the activity of azoxystrobin against southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.), Rhizoctonia pod rot (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azoxystrobin at 0.22 to 0.45 kg/ha applied twice provided control of stem rot, Rhizoctonia pod rot, and leaf spot comparable to tebuconazole at 0.2 kg/ha applied four times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicide treatments increased peanut yield over the untreated check

Treatment
all fungicide treatmentse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasese2
Comparator
untreated checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Texas Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Peanut yield increases were evident with all fungicide treatments over the untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–618 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

53 papers: 40 positive, 13 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    With fungicide, pruned and nonpruned plots did not differ in yield.

    Effect of Crop Pruning on Sclerotinia Blight of Peanut · 1997 · compared with nonpruned plots treated with these fungicides

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.