Paper · 2008 · Plant Production Science

Effects of Waterlogging on Nitrogen Fixation and Photosynthesis in Supernodulating Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100

Gunho Jung; Toshinori Matsunami; Kenji Nagata; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The supernodulating soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivar Kanto 100 was previously characterized by superior nitrogen (N) fixation and photosynthesis, and resulting in high yields. However, this cultivar seems to be susceptible to waterlogging during the vegetative growth stage, which frequently occurs in major soybean producing areas in East Asia. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of waterlogging on nodulation, N fixation and photosynthesis in Kanto 100 with those in its normally-nodulating ancestral cultivar Enrei. Kanto 100 and Enrei were grown in pots, and subjected to waterlogging for 10 days at three vegetative growth stages in 2003 and 2004. Waterlogging significantly reduced the number of nodules of both cultivars, but the magnitude of the reduction was more pronounced in Kanto 100. The acetylene reduction activity (ARA) of nodules and apparent photosynthetic rate (AP) of leaves were generally depressed immediately after the start of waterlogging, but both functions recovered substantially at the pod-filling stage in both cultivars. No marked cultivar difference was found in the magnitude of the reduction of ARA per plant and AP measured immediately after waterlogging and at the pod-filling stage in both years, but growth impairment was more pronounced in Kanto 100 in 2003. These results suggest that the supernodulating cultivar Kanto 100 is more susceptible to waterlogging than its normally-nodulating ancestral cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly reduced nodule number in both soybean cultivars.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging significantly reduced the number of nodules of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The waterlogging reduction in nodule number was more pronounced in Kanto 100.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanto 100e0
Outcome
magnitude of the reductione0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the magnitude of the reduction was more pronounced in Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging initially depressed nodule acetylene reduction activity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
acetylene reduction activity (ARA) of nodulese0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
immediately after the start of waterlogginge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acetylene reduction activity (ARA) of nodules and apparent photosynthetic rate (AP) of leaves were generally depressed immediately after the start of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging initially depressed apparent leaf photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
apparent photosynthetic rate (AP) of leavese0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acetylene reduction activity (ARA) of nodules and apparent photosynthetic rate (AP) of leaves were generally depressed immediately after the start of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both functions substantially recovered at pod filling in both cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
pod-filling stagee0
Outcome
both functionse0
Direction
recovered substantiallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both functions recovered substantially at the pod-filling stage in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars had no marked difference in waterlogging reduction of plant ARA and AP.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanto 100t0
Outcome
magnitude of the reduction of ARA per plant and APe0
Direction
No marked cultivar differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No marked cultivar difference was found in the magnitude of the reduction of ARA per plant and AP measured immediately after waterlogging and at the pod-filling stage in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth impairment was greater in Kanto 100 in 2003.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanto 100e0
Outcome
growth impairmente0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
in 2003e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth impairment was more pronounced in Kanto 100 in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Cultivar Kanto 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–109 · show in text ↑

flooding · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 5 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 0 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.