Paper · 2011 · Plant Production Science

Effects of Short-Term Waterlogging on Soybean Nodule Nitrogen Fixation at Different Soil Reductions and Temperatures

Tomiya Maekawa; Satoshi Shimamura; Shinji Shimada

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Short-term waterlogging often occurs in upland fields converted from paddies in Japan, since paddy fields have poor surface drainage and a high water table. The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures. Acetylene reduction activity (ARA) was reduced by W treatment for 3, 5 and 7 days (d), ARA was restored to the same level as in the control (C) at 3 days after the end of the treatment (DAT). However, ARA reduced by the WR treatment for 3, 5 and 7 d in a greenhouse was not restored. In the experiments under three soil temperature conditions (lower than 30ºC, around 34ºC and higher than 36ºC) and with two waterlogging durations (3 and 5d) in the growth chamber, ARA reduced by the W treatment was restored after the treatment irrespective of soil temperature and waterlogging duration whereas ARA reduced by WR was restored only after the short-term waterlogging at a low soil temperature. The nodule dry weight and respiration rate of the root system significantly decreased when ARA was greatly reduced. In addition, ARA at 3 DAT was positively correlated with stomatal conductance (SC) at 4 DAT. We concluded that the recovery of nodule nitrogen fixation from the reduction by waterlogging is strongly affected by the oxidation-reduction potential and temperature of the soil, and the nodule damage could be evaluated by SC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W treatment for 3, 5 and 7 days reduced acetylene reduction activity in soybean relative to the control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
W treatment for 3, 5 and 7 dayse1
Outcome
Acetylene reduction activity (ARA)e1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
control (C)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acetylene reduction activity (ARA) was reduced by W treatment for 3, 5 and 7 days (d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–443 · show in text ↑
e2

“ARA was restored to the same level as in the control (C) at 3 days after the end of the treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction activity reduced by W treatment was restored to the control level 3 days after the treatment ended.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
W treatmente1
Outcome
ARAe2
Direction
restored to the same levele2
Comparator
control (C)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acetylene reduction activity (ARA) was reduced by W treatment for 3, 5 and 7 days (d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–443 · show in text ↑
e2

“ARA was restored to the same level as in the control (C) at 3 days after the end of the treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARA reduced by WR treatment for 3, 5 and 7 days was not restored in a greenhouse.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
WR treatment for 3, 5 and 7 de1
Outcome
ARAe1
Direction
not restorede1
Setting
a greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“ARA reduced by the WR treatment for 3, 5 and 7 d in a greenhouse was not restored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARA reduced by WR was restored only after short-term waterlogging at a low soil temperature.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
short-term waterlogging at a low soil temperaturee1
Outcome
ARAe1
Direction
restorede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“ARA reduced by WR was restored only after the short-term waterlogging at a low soil temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1049 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule dry weight and root system respiration rate significantly decreased in soybean when ARA was greatly reduced.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
root systeme1
Outcome
nodule dry weight and respiration rate of the root systeme1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nodule dry weight and respiration rate of the root system significantly decreased when ARA was greatly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARA at 3 DAT was positively correlated with stomatal conductance at 4 DAT in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
ARA at 3 DATe1
Outcome
stomatal conductance (SC)e1
Direction
positivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“ARA at 3 DAT was positively correlated with stomatal conductance (SC) at 4 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1258 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of nodule nitrogen fixation is strongly affected by soil oxidation-reduction potential and temperature.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
oxidation-reduction potential and temperature of the soile1
Outcome
recovery of nodule nitrogen fixatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“the recovery of nodule nitrogen fixation from the reduction by waterlogging is strongly affected by the oxidation-reduction potential and temperature of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1439 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule damage in soybean could be evaluated by stomatal conductance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
the nodule damage could be evaluated by SCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of different durations of waterlogging (W) and waterlogging with soil reduction (WR) on soybean nitrogen fixation at different soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nodule damage could be evaluated by SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1487 · show in text ↑

flooding · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 5 positive, 14 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.