Paper · 2014 · Crop Science

Responses of Canopy Reflectance, Light Interception, and Soybean Seed Yield to Replanting Suboptimal Stands

Adam P. Gaspar; Shawn P. Conley

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
75
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] planting date trends have steadily shifted earlier within the northern Corn Belt, while inclement weather, insect pressure, and disease pressure associated with spring planting can result in replanting some years. However, limited published literature exists about soybean replant thresholds for suboptimal plant stands and the effects of seed treatments on this decision. This study evaluated three planting dates, three seed treatments, and twelve seeding rate–replant combinations to determine replant thresholds in terms of maximizing seed yield, the effects of seed treatments on these thresholds, and the relationship of cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) and cumulative normalized difference vegetative index (CumNDVI) on seed yield. Trials were conducted during 2012 and 2013 in southern Wisconsin. Soybean planting in early May increased seed yield by 358 kg ha −1 compared with late May and by 805 kg ha −1 compared with mid‐June. Seed yield reductions were due to decreased seeds m −2 while CIPAR and CumNDVI measurements may partially explain this planting date effect. When initial plant stands were below threshold (<247,000 plants ha –1 ), filling in these stands with enough seed to bring the final plant stand above the threshold increased yield, whereas using tillage and replanting the entire stand only increased yield when initial plant stands were extremely low (<91,000 plants ha −1 ). Yield was related to both CIPAR ( R 2 = 0.54) and CumNDVI ( R 2 = 0.49) and the latter two variables were highly correlated ( r = 0.89). We observed linear yield increases through 700 MJ m −2 of CIPAR; therefore, management practices to increase CIPAR should be used. This study showed that early May planting with a fungicide/insecticide seed treatment (CruiserMaxx) and generating adequate plant stands (>247,000 plants ha −1 ) maximized CIPAR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early May planting increased yield by 358 kg ha −1 compared with late May.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
planting in early Maye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
358 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
late Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean planting in early May increased seed yield by 358 kg ha −1 compared with late May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early May planting increased yield by 805 kg ha −1 compared with mid-June.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
planting in early Maye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
805 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
mid‐Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean planting in early May increased seed yield by 358 kg ha −1 compared with late May and by 805 kg ha −1 compared with mid‐June.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1015 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reductions with later planting were attributed to fewer seeds per area.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Seed yield reductionse0
Qualifier
decreased seeds m −2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield reductions were due to decreased seeds m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filling below-threshold stands to above threshold increased yield.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
filling in these stands with enough seede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
<247,000 plants ha –1e0
Comparator
initial plant stands were below thresholde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When initial plant stands were below threshold (<247,000 plants ha –1 ), filling in these stands with enough seed to bring the final plant stand above the threshold increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-stand tillage and replanting increased yield only at extremely low initial stands.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
using tillage and replanting the entire stande0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
<91,000 plants ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using tillage and replanting the entire stand only increased yield when initial plant stands were extremely low (<91,000 plants ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was related to CIPAR with R² 0.54.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Yielde0
Value
R 2 = 0.54e0
Comparator
CIPARe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was related to both CIPAR ( R 2 = 0.54)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was related to CumNDVI with R² 0.49.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
CumNDVIe0
Value
R 2 = 0.49e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CumNDVI ( R 2 = 0.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIPAR and CumNDVI were highly correlated at r = 0.89.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
highly correlatede0
Value
r = 0.89e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the latter two variables were highly correlated ( r = 0.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased linearly through 700 MJ m −2 of CIPAR.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
700 MJ m −2e0
Comparator
CIPARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed linear yield increases through 700 MJ m −2 of CIPAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend management that increases CIPAR.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
management practices to increase CIPAR should be usede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management practices to increase CIPAR should be used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early May planting with CruiserMaxx and adequate stands maximized CIPAR.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
early May planting with a fungicide/insecticide seed treatment (CruiserMaxx)e0
Outcome
CIPARe0
Direction
maximizede0
Qualifier
>247,000 plants ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early May planting with a fungicide/insecticide seed treatment (CruiserMaxx) and generating adequate plant stands (>247,000 plants ha −1 ) maximized CIPAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑

insecticide · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 115 positive, 92 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

fungicide · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.