Paper · 2002 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The impact of diversification of a rice–wheat cropping system on crop productivity and soil fertility

V. K. SINGH; B. B. SHARMA; B. S. DWIVEDI

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar during 1996/97 and 1997/98. Each experiment comprised 10 crop sequences: (a) wheat–rice, (b) chickpea–rice, (c) lentil–rice, (d) pea–rice, (e) wheat–mungbean green manure–rice, (f) wheat–Sesbania green manure–rice, (g) wheat–fodder–rice, (h) chickpea–fodder–rice, (i) lentil–fodder–rice and (j) pea–fodder–rice, in a randomized block design with four replications. The crop sequences were compared in terms of economic rice equivalent yield (REY), protein production, apparent nutrient balances and effect on soil fertility status. Amongst crop sequences involving two crops each year (200% cropping intensity), chickpea–rice gave highest REY and protein production. Of the sequences involving three crops each year (300% cropping intensity), chickpea–fodder–rice and wheat–fodder–rice were superior to others. The P balances were positive for all sequences, whereas K balances were generally negative except for sequences involving green manure legumes. Green manuring with Sesbania or mungbean helped restore soil fertility, indicating the advantage of green manure for higher productivity and sustainability of rice–wheat system. Chickpea–rice and chickpea–fodder–rice appeared promising alternatives to rice–wheat crop sequence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–rice had the highest rice equivalent yield and protein production among two crop sequences.

Treatment
chickpea–ricee0
Outcome
REY and protein productione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amongst crop sequences involving two crops each year (200% cropping intensity), chickpea–rice gave highest REY and protein production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–fodder–rice was superior among three crop sequences.

Treatment
chickpea–fodder–ricee0
Outcome
superior to otherse0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the sequences involving three crops each year (300% cropping intensity), chickpea–fodder–rice and wheat–fodder–rice were superior to others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat–fodder–rice was superior among three crop sequences.

Treatment
wheat–fodder–ricee0
Outcome
superior to otherse0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the sequences involving three crops each year (300% cropping intensity), chickpea–fodder–rice and wheat–fodder–rice were superior to others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus balances were positive across all sequences.

Outcome
P balancese0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P balances were positive for all sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium balances were generally negative except with green manure legumes.

Outcome
K balancese0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
except for sequences involving green manure legumese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K balances were generally negative except for sequences involving green manure legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure helped restore soil fertility.

Treatment
Sesbaniae0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
restoree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manuring with Sesbania or mungbean helped restore soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean green manure helped restore soil fertility.

Treatment
mungbeane0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
restoree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manuring with Sesbania or mungbean helped restore soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–rice was identified as a promising alternative to rice–wheat.

Outcome
Chickpea–ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea–rice and chickpea–fodder–rice appeared promising alternatives to rice–wheat crop sequence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–fodder–rice was identified as a promising alternative to rice–wheat.

Outcome
chickpea–fodder–ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea–rice and chickpea–fodder–rice appeared promising alternatives to rice–wheat crop sequence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Sesbania · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Vigna radiata · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.