Paper · 2011 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Integrated assessment of diversification of rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic plain

Ravi Kant Singh; Jitendra Singh Bohra; Triyugi Nath; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system may improve the productivity and sustainability of agricultural production in the Indo-Gangetic plane region (IGPR), but the choice of alternative sequences to be used requires integrated assessment of various crop sequences. A long-term field experiment was initiated during 2000–01 on sandy loam soil at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India to assess 10 rice-based cropping sequences – rice-wheat, rice-chickpea, rice-wheat-green gram, rice-wheat-Sesbania (green manure), rice-mustard-green gram, rice-lentil-cowpea (fodder), rice-pea, rice-lentil + mustard (3:1)-cowpea (fodder), rice-maize (cob) + vegetable pea (1:1)-cowpea (fodder) and rice-potato-green gram in randomized block design with four replications. The data contained in this paper are for the year 2002–03 and 2003–04. Substitution of rice-wheat with 300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green gram resulted in maximum production cost but gave the highest system productivity, net return, benefit:cost ratio, production efficiency, profitability and energy productivity. Inclusion of summer grain/fodder legume or Sesbania for green manuring improved the content of soil organic matter. The soil P status was positively affected in all the sequences and particularly those with summer crops. Decline in soil available K in all the sequences indicated inadequacy of present recommended rate of fertilizer K to all the component crops in different sequences.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting rice-wheat with 300% intensity sequences, particularly rice-potato-green gram, resulted in maximum production cost.

Treatment
300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green grame2
Outcome
production coste2
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
rice-wheate2
Setting
Varanasi, Indiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“A long-term field experiment was initiated during 2000–01 on sandy loam soil at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–393 · show in text ↑
e2

“Substitution of rice-wheat with 300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green gram resulted in maximum production cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting rice-wheat with 300% intensity sequences, particularly rice-potato-green gram, gave the highest system productivity, net return and benefit:cost ratio.

Treatment
300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green grame2
Outcome
system productivity, net return, benefit:cost ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
rice-wheate2
Setting
Varanasi, Indiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“A long-term field experiment was initiated during 2000–01 on sandy loam soil at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–393 · show in text ↑
e2

“Substitution of rice-wheat with 300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green gram resulted in maximum production cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
e3

“gave the highest system productivity, net return, benefit:cost ratio, production efficiency, profitability and energy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting rice-wheat with 300% intensity sequences, particularly rice-potato-green gram, gave the highest production efficiency, profitability and energy productivity.

Treatment
300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green grame2
Outcome
production efficiency, profitability and energy productivitye3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
rice-wheate2
Setting
Varanasi, Indiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“A long-term field experiment was initiated during 2000–01 on sandy loam soil at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–393 · show in text ↑
e2

“Substitution of rice-wheat with 300% intensity cropping sequences particularly with rice-potato-green gram resulted in maximum production cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
e3

“gave the highest system productivity, net return, benefit:cost ratio, production efficiency, profitability and energy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer grain or fodder legumes, or Sesbania, used for green manuring improved soil organic matter content.

Treatment
Inclusion of summer grain/fodder legume or Sesbania for green manuringe5
Outcome
content of soil organic mattere5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e5

“Inclusion of summer grain/fodder legume or Sesbania for green manuring improved the content of soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P status was positively affected in all cropping sequences, particularly those with summer crops.

Treatment
all the sequencese6
Outcome
soil P statuse6
Direction
positively affectede6
Qualifier
particularly those with summer cropse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e6

“The soil P status was positively affected in all the sequences and particularly those with summer crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available K declined in all cropping sequences.

Outcome
soil available Ke7
Direction
Declinee7
Qualifier
in all the sequencese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e7

“Decline in soil available K in all the sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1386 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The present recommended rate of fertilizer K is inadequate for the component crops.

Outcome
present recommended rate of fertilizer Ke7
Qualifier
inadequacye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversification of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e7

“indicated inadequacy of present recommended rate of fertilizer K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1451 · show in text ↑

Sesbania · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.