Paper · 2000 · Plant Disease

A New Bipartite Geminivirus (Begomovirus) Causing Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits in the Imperial Valley of California

P. Guzman; M. R. Sudarshana; Y.-S. Seo; et al.

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During fall 1998, volunteer watermelons (Citrullus lunatus L. (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai) showing leaf curl, crumpling, and yellowing symptoms were found in a commercial honeydew melon (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo Inodorus group) field in the Imperial Valley of California. The plants were infected with a begomovirus (family Geminiviridae, genus Begomovirus) based on (i) a positive response in squash blots probed with a general begomovirus DNA probe (1) and (ii) amplification of DNA-A (≈1.2 kb) and DNA-B (≈1.4 kb) fragments by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with degenerate DNA-A (PAL1v1978/PAR1c496) and DNA-B (PBL1v2040/PBR1c970) primers, respectively (3). The DNA-A and -B fragments were cloned and sequenced (GenBank accession nos. AF224760 [DNA-A] and AF224761 [DNA-B]). The DNA-A and -B fragments had a nearly identical (99.5%) common region (CR) of 186 (DNA-A) and 187 (DNA-B) nucleotides, indicating they were from the same begomovirus. Database searches conducted with these sequences revealed no high degree of sequence identity (i.e., >90%) with other begomoviruses, including Squash leaf curl virus (SqLCV [2]) from southern California. The partial AC1 sequence (669 nt) was most identical to Tomato severe leaf curl virus (ToSLCV) from Guatemala (83%) and SqLCV (81%), the partial AV1 sequence (135 nt) was most identical to Tomato golden mosaic virus from Brazil (84%) and SqLCV (81%), and the CR was most identical to Squash yellow mottle virus from Costa Rica (81%), ToSLCV (81%), and SqLCV (77%). The partial BV1 sequence (465 nt) was most identical to Bean calico mosaic virus and SqLCV (72%), and the partial BC1 sequence (158 nt) was most identical to SqLCV (75%). Watermelon seedlings bombarded with a DNA extract from infected watermelon volunteers developed crumpling and distortion symptoms, whereas seedlings bombarded with gold particles alone developed no symptoms. Geminivirus infection in symptomatic seedlings was confirmed by PCR. These results suggest a new begomovirus caused the disease symptoms in the watermelon volunteers. Leaf crumpling and curling symptoms were not observed in spring melons in the Imperial Valley in 1999, but on 2 July and 17 August 1999, cantaloupe (C. melo L. subsp. melo Cantalupensis group), muskmelon (C. melo L. subsp. melo Cantalupensis group), and watermelon plants with leaf crumpling and yellowing were found. These plants were infected with the new begomovirus based on sequence analysis of PCR-amplified DNA-A fragments (97 to 98% identity for CR and partial AC1 sequence). A survey of fall melons, conducted 23 to 24 September 1999, revealed widespread symptoms of leaf curl and crumpling on new growth of muskmelon plants in all seven commercial fields examined (estimated incidence 25 to 50%) and on watermelon volunteers. No such symptoms were observed on leaves of honeydew melons. Symptomatic muskmelon and watermelon leaves, collected from eight locations throughout the Imperial Valley, were infected with the new begomovirus based on sequence analysis of PCR-amplified DNA-A fragments. Thus, a new begomovirus has emerged in the Imperial Valley; the name Cucurbit leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) is proposed. References: (1) R. L. Gilbertson et al. Plant Dis. 75: 336, 1991. (2) S. G. Lazarowitz and I. B. Lazdins. Virology 180:58, 1991. (3) M. R. Rojas et al. Plant Dis. 77:340, 1993.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon seedlings bombarded with a DNA extract from infected watermelon volunteers developed crumpling and distortion symptoms, whereas seedlings bombarded with gold particles alone developed no symptoms.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
DNA extract from infected watermelon volunteerse0
Outcome
crumpling and distortion symptomse0
Comparator
gold particles alonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon seedlings bombarded with a DNA extract from infected watermelon volunteers developed crumpling and distortion symptoms, whereas seedlings bombarded with gold particles alone developed no symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geminivirus infection was confirmed by PCR in symptomatic seedlings.

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Interactor
GeminivirusGeminiviridaee0pathogen
Outcome
Geminivirus infectione0
Qualifier
in symptomatic seedlingse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Geminivirus infection in symptomatic seedlings was confirmed by PCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–1964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The common regions of the DNA-A and DNA-B fragments were nearly identical, 99.5%.

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
common regione0
Value
99.5%e0
Qualifier
nearly identicale0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DNA-A and -B fragments had a nearly identical (99.5%) common region (CR) of 186 (DNA-A) and 187 (DNA-B) nucleotides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new begomovirus showed no high sequence identity (above 90%) with other begomoviruses.

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
sequence identitye0
Qualifier
i.e., >90%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Database searches conducted with these sequences revealed no high degree of sequence identity (i.e., >90%) with other begomoviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial AC1 sequence was most identical to Tomato severe leaf curl virus (83%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
partial AC1 sequencee0
Value
83%e0
Comparator
Tomato severe leaf curl virus (ToSLCV)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The partial AC1 sequence (669 nt) was most identical to Tomato severe leaf curl virus (ToSLCV) from Guatemala (83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial AC1 sequence was most identical to SqLCV (81%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
partial AC1 sequencee0
Value
81%e0
Comparator
SqLCVe0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The partial AC1 sequence (669 nt) was most identical to Tomato severe leaf curl virus (ToSLCV) from Guatemala (83%) and SqLCV (81%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial AV1 sequence was most identical to Tomato golden mosaic virus (84%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
partial AV1 sequencee0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
Tomato golden mosaic viruse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The partial AV1 sequence (135 nt) was most identical to Tomato golden mosaic virus from Brazil (84%) and SqLCV (81%)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1286–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The common region was most identical to Squash yellow mottle virus (81%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
CRe0
Value
81%e0
Comparator
Squash yellow mottle viruse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“the CR was most identical to Squash yellow mottle virus from Costa Rica (81%), ToSLCV (81%), and SqLCV (77%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1516 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial BV1 sequence was most identical to Bean calico mosaic virus and SqLCV (72%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
partial BV1 sequencee0
Value
72%e0
Comparator
Bean calico mosaic viruse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The partial BV1 sequence (465 nt) was most identical to Bean calico mosaic virus and SqLCV (72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1614 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial BC1 sequence was most identical to SqLCV (75%).

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
partial BC1 sequencee0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
SqLCVe0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“the partial BC1 sequence (158 nt) was most identical to SqLCV (75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1687 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cantaloupe, muskmelon and watermelon plants with leaf crumpling and yellowing were found in July and August 1999.

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Outcome
leaf crumpling and yellowinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“on 2 July and 17 August 1999, cantaloupe (C. melo L. subsp. melo Cantalupensis group), muskmelon (C. melo L. subsp. melo Cantalupensis group), and watermelon plants with leaf crumpling and yellowing were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Widespread leaf curl and crumpling occurred on muskmelon in all seven commercial fields surveyed in fall 1999, at an estimated incidence of 25 to 50%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Outcome
leaf curl and crumplinge0
Value
25 to 50%e0
Qualifier
widespreade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“revealed widespread symptoms of leaf curl and crumpling on new growth of muskmelon plants in all seven commercial fields examined (estimated incidence 25 to 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2608–2769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No such symptoms were observed on honeydew melon leaves.

Taxon
honeydew melonsCucumis melo var. inodoruse0
Outcome
symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. inodorus
Cucumis melo var. inodorus · TaxonYotoen · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No such symptoms were observed on leaves of honeydew melons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2800–2859 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symptomatic muskmelon and watermelon leaves from eight locations in the Imperial Valley were infected with the new begomovirus.

Taxon
muskmelon and watermelonCitrullus lanatusCucumis meloe0
Interactor
new begomoviruse0pathogen
Outcome
infected with the new begomoviruse0
Setting
eight locations throughout the Imperial Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symptomatic muskmelon and watermelon leaves, collected from eight locations throughout the Imperial Valley, were infected with the new begomovirus based on sequence analysis of PCR-amplified DNA-A fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2861–3067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A new begomovirus, named Cucurbit leaf crumple virus, has emerged in the Imperial Valley.

Taxon
Cucurbitst0
Interactor
Cucurbit leaf crumple virusCucurbit leaf crumple viruse0pathogen
Outcome
a new begomovirus has emerged in the Imperial Valleye0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Curl and Crumpling in Cucurbits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thus, a new begomovirus has emerged in the Imperial Valley; the name Cucurbit leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV) is proposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3069–3186 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

infection · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.