Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Pest Management

Biological control of the rice root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne graminicolaon rice, using endophytic and rhizosphere fungi

Huong T.T. Le; Jonathan L. Padgham; Richard A. Sikora

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We investigated the antagonistic activities of endophytic and rhizosphere fungi, isolated from three different rice cropping areas in Vietnam, against the rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola. Amongst the three types of soils (alluvial, acid sulphate and gleyic acrisol), the alluvial soils contained the highest number of fungal strains that were able endophytically to colonise rice roots, and also showed a high biological control potential against the rice root-knot nematode. The gleyic acrisol contained fewer fungi with intermediate biological control levels while the acid sulphate soil hosted the lowest number of endophytic fungi. By inoculating roots of rice seedlings with conidia of endophytic and rhizosphere Fusarium isolates, root-galling severity was reduced by 29–42% and root weight was increased by up to 33%. Trichoderma species, which were recovered only from the rhizosphere of the rice plants grown in the three sampled soils, showed similar biological control effects on nematode galling and on plant growth by reducing galling severity by up to 38%. We conclude that Fusarium and Trichoderma isolates are potential biological control agents against M. graminicola in rice in that fungal treatments reduced root-knot levels significantly and that depending on initial nematode density in the soil, these reductions would have an economic impact on rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alluvial soils contained the most rice root-colonizing fungal strains.

Outcome
number of fungal strains that were able endophytically to colonise rice rootse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
alluvial soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the alluvial soils contained the highest number of fungal strains that were able endophytically to colonise rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alluvial soil fungi showed high biological control potential against rice root-knot nematode.

Outcome
biological control potential against the rice root-knot nematodee0
Direction
highe0
Setting
alluvial soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“also showed a high biological control potential against the rice root-knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–490 · show in text ↑
e1

“the alluvial soils contained the highest number of fungal strains that were able endophytically to colonise rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gleyic acrisol contained fewer fungi with intermediate biological control.

Outcome
fungie0
Direction
fewere0
Setting
gleyic acrisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gleyic acrisol contained fewer fungi with intermediate biological control levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–576 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid sulphate soil hosted the fewest endophytic fungi.

Outcome
number of endophytic fungie0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
acid sulphate soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the acid sulphate soil hosted the lowest number of endophytic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation reduced rice root galling severity by 29–42%.

Treatment
inoculating roots of rice seedlings with conidia of endophytic and rhizosphere Fusarium isolatese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae1pathogen
Second interactor
FusariumFusariume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-galling severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29–42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By inoculating roots of rice seedlings with conidia of endophytic and rhizosphere Fusarium isolates, root-galling severity was reduced by 29–42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation increased rice root weight by up to 33%.

Treatment
inoculating roots of rice seedlings with conidia of endophytic and rhizosphere Fusarium isolatese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By inoculating roots of rice seedlings with conidia of endophytic and rhizosphere Fusarium isolates, root-galling severity was reduced by 29–42% and root weight was increased by up to 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma species were recovered only from rice rhizosphere.

Interactor
Trichoderma speciesTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
recovered only from the rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma species, which were recovered only from the rhizosphere of the rice plants grown in the three sampled soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma reduced rice nematode galling severity by up to 38%.

Treatment
Trichoderma speciese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae1pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma speciesTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
galling severitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
up to 38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma species, which were recovered only from the rhizosphere of the rice plants grown in the three sampled soils, showed similar biological control effects on nematode galling and on plant growth by reducing galling severity by up to 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma showed a biological control effect on rice plant growth.

Treatment
Trichoderma speciese0
Interactor
Trichoderma speciesTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma species, which were recovered only from the rhizosphere of the rice plants grown in the three sampled soils, showed similar biological control effects on nematode galling and on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1043 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Fusarium and Trichoderma potential biological control agents for rice root-knot nematode.

Outcome
potential biological control agents against M. graminicolae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium and Trichoderma isolates are potential biological control agents against M. graminicola in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1208 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Fusarium · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 362 positive, 37 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.