Paper · 2002 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Wheat genotypes differ in growth and phosphorus uptake when supplied with different sources and rates of phosphorus banded or mixed in soil in pots

G. R. Valizadeh; Z. Rengel; A. W. Rate

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth response of wheat genotypes supplied with phosphorus fertiliser at different rates (banded or mixed throughout the soil) and sparingly soluble phosphorus sources (aluminium phosphate and iron phosphate) is not known. Eleven wheat genotypes and 1 rye genotype were tested at 3 rates of phosphorus fertiliser application (5, 10 and 20 mg P/kg soil) in a pot study. Another experiment compared 4 wheat genotypes at 2 rates of phosphorus application (deficient and sufficient) and 2 application methods (banding and mixing throughout the soil). The selected wheat genotypes were also used to investigate growth and root exudation response to iron phosphate and aluminium phosphate supply. Banding of phosphorus fertiliser increased the uptake of phosphorus and wheat growth compared with mixing phosphorus throughout the soil. Wheat genotypes did not differ significantly in growth and phosphorus uptake at the low rate of application. With increasing rates of phosphorus supply, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive wheat genotypes (Wawht 2074 and Aroona) had significantly increased phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weights. When supplied with aluminium phosphate and iron phosphate, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive genotypes had larger roots and higher concentration of phosphorus in the shoots and roots, while the phosphorus utilisation-efficient wheat genotypes (Westonia and Gutha) had higher shoot weights than phosphorus fertiliser-responsive ones. All wheat genotypes produced quantitatively and qualitatively similar root exudates in the iron phosphate, aluminium phosphate and zero-phosphorus treatments. The aluminium phosphate treatment caused genotypes to increase root exudation of oxalic anions, uptake of phosphorus and growth, compared with the iron phosphate treatment. It was concluded that the choice of genotypes for achieving increased wheat growth would depend on the phosphorus source in soil and the rate of application of phosphorus fertiliser.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded phosphorus increased wheat uptake and growth versus mixed phosphorus.

Treatment
Banding of phosphorus fertilisere0
Outcome
uptake of phosphorus and wheat growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mixing phosphorus throughout the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banding of phosphorus fertiliser increased the uptake of phosphorus and wheat growth compared with mixing phosphorus throughout the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low application rate, wheat genotypes did not differ significantly in growth and phosphorus uptake.

Outcome
growth and phosphorus uptakee0
Qualifier
low rate of applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat genotypes did not differ significantly in growth and phosphorus uptake at the low rate of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus supply significantly increased phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weight in Wawht 2074.

Material
Wawht 2074e0
Treatment
increasing rates of phosphorus supplye0
Outcome
phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing rates of phosphorus supply, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive wheat genotypes (Wawht 2074 and Aroona) had significantly increased phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus supply significantly increased phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weight in Aroona.

Material
Aroonae0
Treatment
increasing rates of phosphorus supplye0
Outcome
phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing rates of phosphorus supply, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive wheat genotypes (Wawht 2074 and Aroona) had significantly increased phosphorus uptake and root and shoot weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With aluminium phosphate, responsive genotypes had larger roots and more phosphorus in roots and shoots.

Taxon
genotypese0
Treatment
aluminium phosphatee0
Outcome
roots and higher concentration of phosphorus in the shoots and rootse0
Direction
largere0

Verbatim

e0

“When supplied with aluminium phosphate and iron phosphate, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive genotypes had larger roots and higher concentration of phosphorus in the shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With iron phosphate, responsive genotypes had larger roots and more phosphorus in roots and shoots.

Taxon
genotypese0
Treatment
iron phosphatee0
Outcome
roots and higher concentration of phosphorus in the shoots and rootse0
Direction
largere0

Verbatim

e0

“When supplied with aluminium phosphate and iron phosphate, the 2 phosphorus-fertiliser-responsive genotypes had larger roots and higher concentration of phosphorus in the shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Westonia had higher shoot weight than responsive genotypes.

Material
Westoniae0
Outcome
shoot weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
phosphorus fertiliser-responsive onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phosphorus utilisation-efficient wheat genotypes (Westonia and Gutha) had higher shoot weights than phosphorus fertiliser-responsive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gutha had higher shoot weight than responsive genotypes.

Material
Guthae0
Outcome
shoot weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
phosphorus fertiliser-responsive onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phosphorus utilisation-efficient wheat genotypes (Westonia and Gutha) had higher shoot weights than phosphorus fertiliser-responsive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All wheat genotypes produced quantitatively and qualitatively similar root exudates across the tested phosphorus treatments.

Outcome
root exudatese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All wheat genotypes produced quantitatively and qualitatively similar root exudates in the iron phosphate, aluminium phosphate and zero-phosphorus treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium phosphate increased oxalic-anion exudation, phosphorus uptake and growth versus iron phosphate.

Treatment
aluminium phosphate treatmente0
Outcome
root exudation of oxalic anions, uptake of phosphorus and growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
iron phosphate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aluminium phosphate treatment caused genotypes to increase root exudation of oxalic anions, uptake of phosphorus and growth, compared with the iron phosphate treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.