Paper · 1995 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Timing Effect on Bread Wheat Protein in Eastern Canada

Micheline Ayoub; S. Guertin; D. L. Smith

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen management for production of bread quality wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada has received little research attention. An experiment was conducted for 2 years at each of two sites in Québec to study the effect of level and timing of nitrogen (N) fertilizer application on grain protein concentration, protein content per seed, non‐protein seed dry matter, grain protein yield and nitrogen harvest index (portion of plant N in the grain) of four hard red spring wheat cultivars known to have potential as bread wheats in eastern Canada. The soil types were Bearbroock clay (fine, mixed, non‐acid, frigid, Humaquept) and Ste‐Rosalie clay (typic, non‐acid, frigid, Humaquept). The experiment was a 4 × 4 × 2 factorial. Four cultivars were used: Columbus, Katepwa, Max and Hege 155–85. In both years 0, 60, 120 and 180 kg Nha −1 were applied either all at seeding or 60 % at seeding and 40 % at heading. Grain protein concentration and grain protein yield increased consistently with increasing N fertilizer and with split N application. Nitrogen harvest index was not increased by increasing applications of N fertilizer. Protein content per seed was more critical in determining grain protein concentration than non‐protein seed dry matter content. The western Canadian cultivars Columbus and Katepwa generally had greater grain protein concentration than the European cultivars Max and Hege 155–85, With reasonable N fertility the grain protein concentration of spring wheats grown in eastern Canada are sufficient for bread production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer increased grain protein concentration and grain protein yield.

Treatment
increasing N fertilizere0
Outcome
Grain protein concentration and grain protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein concentration and grain protein yield increased consistently with increasing N fertilizer and with split N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen application increased grain protein concentration and grain protein yield.

Treatment
split N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain protein concentration and grain protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein concentration and grain protein yield increased consistently with increasing N fertilizer and with split N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer did not increase nitrogen harvest index.

Treatment
increasing applications of N fertilizere0
Outcome
Nitrogen harvest indexe0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen harvest index was not increased by increasing applications of N fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein per seed was more critical to grain protein concentration than non-protein seed dry matter.

Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Qualifier
Protein content per seed was more criticale0
Comparator
non‐protein seed dry matter contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content per seed was more critical in determining grain protein concentration than non‐protein seed dry matter content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Columbus generally had greater grain protein concentration than Max and Hege 155–85.

Material
Columbuse0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
generallye0
Comparator
Max and Hege 155–85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The western Canadian cultivars Columbus and Katepwa generally had greater grain protein concentration than the European cultivars Max and Hege 155–85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Katepwa generally had greater grain protein concentration than Max and Hege 155–85.

Material
Katepwae0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
generallye0
Comparator
Max and Hege 155–85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The western Canadian cultivars Columbus and Katepwa generally had greater grain protein concentration than the European cultivars Max and Hege 155–85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With reasonable nitrogen fertility, eastern Canadian spring wheat grain protein is sufficient for bread production.

Taxon
spring wheatsTriticume0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
sufficiente0
Qualifier
With reasonable N fertilitye0
Setting
eastern Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With reasonable N fertility the grain protein concentration of spring wheats grown in eastern Canada are sufficient for bread production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1565 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Split N application increased 1000-kernel weight at two site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.