Paper · 2017 · American Research Journal of Agriculture

Influence of Low-N Stress, Genotype and Their Interaction on Grain Yield and Quality Traits of F1 and F2 Diallel Crosses of Wheat (Triticum AestivumL)

A Al-Naggar; R Shabana; M Abd El-Aleem; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Developing high yielding varieties of bread wheat under low soil-N conditions is an important goal for plant breeder in order to overcome the negative impacts of using high rates of N fertilizers. This will lead to a significant reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use. The objective of this investigation was to study the effects of low-N environment (E), genotype (G) and G x E interaction on grain yield and quality traits of wheat F 1 and F 2 diallel crosses and their contrasting parents in N use efficiency. Genetic materials were evaluated at two seasons (2007/2008 and 2008/2009) in a split-plot design with lattice arrangement, using three replications. Main plots were assigned to N levels (0 and 75 kg N/fed), while sup-plots were devoted to genotypes. Data were analyzed across the two seasons. Low-N caused significant reductions in all studied grain yield components and grain protein content (GPC) in parents, F 1 's and F 2 's. The lowest reduction occurred in harvest index (HI), while spikes/plant (SPP) showed the greatest reduction, indicating that SPP is the most determinant component of GYPP. The first three parents L25, L26 and L27 showed significantly higher means than the second three parents Gem7, Gem 9 and Gz168 for most studied grain yield components and GPC trait. The F 1 and F 2 crosses involving one or more of the first three parents showed higher values of one or more of grain yield component traits than crosses that involved parents of the second group. In general, F 1 crosses showed higher means for all studied grain yield and quality traits than their parents. The rank of crosses in F 1 and F 2 generation for most studied traits was changed from one environment (N-level) to another, indicating a significant G x N interaction. Some F 2 -progenies under N-limited environment exhibited higher values of GYPP and HI, suggesting transgressive effects in these characteristics, and that selection practiced in such F 2 populations could be effective in developing low-N tolerant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen significantly reduced grain yield components and grain protein content.

Treatment
Low-Ne0
Outcome
grain yield components and grain protein content (GPC)e0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low-N caused significant reductions in all studied grain yield components and grain protein content (GPC) in parents, F 1 's and F 2 's”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index showed the smallest reduction under low nitrogen.

Outcome
harvest index (HI)e0
Direction
lowest reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest reduction occurred in harvest index (HI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikes per plant showed the greatest reduction under low nitrogen.

Outcome
spikes/plant (SPP)e0
Direction
greatest reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes/plant (SPP) showed the greatest reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L25, L26 and L27 exceeded Gem7, Gem 9 and Gz168 for most yield components and grain protein content.

Material
L25, L26 and L27e0
Outcome
grain yield components and GPC traite0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Gem7, Gem 9 and Gz168e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first three parents L25, L26 and L27 showed significantly higher means than the second three parents Gem7, Gem 9 and Gz168 for most studied grain yield components and GPC trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crosses involving the first parent group had higher yield component values than crosses of the second group.

Material
F 1 and F 2 crossese0
Outcome
grain yield component traitse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The F 1 and F 2 crosses involving one or more of the first three parents showed higher values of one or more of grain yield component traits than crosses that involved parents of the second group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 crosses generally exceeded their parents for yield and quality traits.

Material
F 1 crossese0
Outcome
grain yield and quality traitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
their parentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F 1 crosses showed higher means for all studied grain yield and quality traits than their parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross rankings changed between nitrogen environments, indicating significant genotype by nitrogen interaction.

Material
crosses in F 1 and F 2 generatione0
Treatment
N-levele0
Outcome
rank of crossese0
Direction
changede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rank of crosses in F 1 and F 2 generation for most studied traits was changed from one environment (N-level) to another, indicating a significant G x N interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some F2 progenies under nitrogen limitation had higher grain yield per plant and harvest index.

Material
F 2 -progeniese0
Outcome
GYPP and HIe0
Direction
highere0
Setting
N-limited environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some F 2 -progenies under N-limited environment exhibited higher values of GYPP and HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest selection in these F2 populations could develop low nitrogen tolerant genotypes.

Material
F 2 populationse0
Outcome
developing low-N tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selection practiced in such F 2 populations could be effective in developing low-N tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 400 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.