Paper · 1983 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

CROP COMPETITION AIDS EFFICACY OF WILD OAT HERBICIDES

M. P. SHARMA; W. H. VANDEN BORN

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted over a 2-yr period to evaluate the need for competition by crop plants along with the application of postemergence herbicides for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) control in barley and wheat. Barban, difenzoquat, and barban plus difenzoquat were used in barley and barban, benzoylprop ethyl, diclofop methyl, flamprop methyl, and barban plus benzoylprop ethyl were used in wheat, at the two-leaf stage and the four-leaf stage of wild oats seeded alone or in a crop. Barban and diclofop methyl were effective for wild oat control at both the two-leaf and four-leaf stage of wild oats. Benzoylprop ethyl, difenzoquat and flamprop methyl alone or in combination with barban were more effective at the four-leaf than at the two-leaf stage of wild oats. Herbicide treatments increased barley yield up to 84% and wheat yield up to 177%. In the absence of herbicide treatments, crop competition from barley or wheat reduced the wild oat dry weight by about 50%. Competition by crop plants was essential for effective wild oat control with all foliage-applied wild oat herbicides included in this study.Key words: Competition, crop, wild oat, herbicides, wheat, barley

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barban controlled wild oat at both tested stages.

Taxon
CROPt0
Treatment
Barbane0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat controle0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Barban and diclofop methyl were effective for wild oat control at both the two-leaf and four-leaf stage of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“CROP COMPETITION AIDS EFFICACY OF WILD OAT HERBICIDES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop methyl controlled wild oat at both tested stages.

Treatment
diclofop methyle0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat controle0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barban and diclofop methyl were effective for wild oat control at both the two-leaf and four-leaf stage of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzoylprop ethyl was more effective at the four-leaf stage.

Treatment
Benzoylprop ethyle0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
wild oatse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
two-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzoylprop ethyl, difenzoquat and flamprop methyl alone or in combination with barban were more effective at the four-leaf than at the two-leaf stage of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenzoquat was more effective at the four-leaf stage.

Treatment
difenzoquate0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
wild oatse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
two-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzoylprop ethyl, difenzoquat and flamprop methyl alone or in combination with barban were more effective at the four-leaf than at the two-leaf stage of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“difenzoquat were used in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flamprop methyl was more effective at the four-leaf stage.

Treatment
flamprop methyle0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
wild oatse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
two-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzoylprop ethyl, difenzoquat and flamprop methyl alone or in combination with barban were more effective at the four-leaf than at the two-leaf stage of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides increased barley yield by up to 84%.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
84%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatments increased barley yield up to 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides increased wheat yield by up to 177%.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse1
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede1
Value
177%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield up to 177%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatments increased barley yield up to 84% and wheat yield up to 177%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without herbicides, barley competition reduced wild oat dry weight by about 50%.

Treatment
crop competition from barleye0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of herbicide treatments, crop competition from barley or wheat reduced the wild oat dry weight by about 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without herbicides, wheat competition reduced wild oat dry weight by about 50%.

Treatment
crop competition from barley or wheate0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of herbicide treatments, crop competition from barley or wheat reduced the wild oat dry weight by about 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–980 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop competition was essential to effective wild oat herbicide control.

Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
effective wild oat controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition by crop plants was essential for effective wild oat control with all foliage-applied wild oat herbicides included in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“in barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–216 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Benzoylprop-ethyl · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Flamprop · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Difenzoquat · Avena · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

methyl · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

diclofop-methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

competition · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.