Paper · 1979 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban

BJ Wilson

18
claims
54
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The post-emergence herbicides, difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl and dichlofop methyl were evaluated for their effect on wild oats (Avena sterilis and A. fatua) and selectivity in wheat and barley crops on the Darling Downs, Queensland. Barban was included as a standard treatment. These herbicides generally did not provide complete control of wild oats. Wild oat control as measured near harvest-time, was equally as good with tillering or pre-tillering applications, with only two exceptions. Production of wild oat spikelets was reduced by all herbicides. However, although spikelet numbers were reduced to a very low level occasionally, spikelet production was usually quite substantial (500 to 1500 m-2). The most consistent increases in grain yield were obtained from dichlofop methyl (0.75 kg ha-1), difenzoquat (0.75 kg ha-1) and barban (0.175 kg ha-1) when applied prior to the tillering stage of the wild oats. With a few exceptions, dichlofop methyl, difenzoquat, and flamprop-methyl (0.45 kg ha-1) applied during tillering did not increase grain yield. Difenzoquat and flamprop-methyl were also evaluated at 1.5 and 0.9 kg ha-1 respectively. Apart from a small yield increase in two trials there was no advantage from these higher rates. For dichlofop methyl a rate of 0.5 kg ha-1 was less effective than 0.75 kg ha-1 in one of two trials in 1976. In weed-free trials, flamprop-methyl reduced the height and grain yield of the cultivar Kite, but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars. The damage occurred when flamprop-methyl was applied at the end of tillering, but not at the early tillering stage. These trials show that an increase in grain yield can occur when the effect on the wild oats has been only moderate, so herbicide performance should not be judged only by the effect on the wild oats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides generally failed to completely control wild oats.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
control of wild oatse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These herbicides generally did not provide complete control of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control near harvest was generally equivalent for pre-tillering and tillering applications.

Treatment
tilleringe0
Interactor
Wild oate0weed
Outcome
Wild oat controle0
Direction
equally as goode0
Qualifier
with only two exceptionse0
Comparator
pre-tillering applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wild oat control as measured near harvest-time, was equally as good with tillering or pre-tillering applications, with only two exceptions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides reduced wild-oat spikelet production.

Treatment
all herbicidese0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
Production of wild oat spikeletse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Production of wild oat spikelets was reduced by all herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild-oat spikelet production usually remained 500 to 1500 m-2.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenat0weed
Outcome
spikelet productione0
Value
500 to 1500 m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikelet production was usually quite substantial (500 to 1500 m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-tillering dichlofop methyl most consistently increased grain yield.

Treatment
dichlofop methyl (0.75 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most consistent increases in grain yield were obtained from dichlofop methyl (0.75 kg ha-1), difenzoquat (0.75 kg ha-1) and barban (0.175 kg ha-1) when applied prior to the tillering stage of the wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-tillering difenzoquat most consistently increased grain yield.

Treatment
difenzoquat (0.75 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most consistent increases in grain yield were obtained from dichlofop methyl (0.75 kg ha-1), difenzoquat (0.75 kg ha-1) and barban (0.175 kg ha-1) when applied prior to the tillering stage of the wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-tillering barban most consistently increased grain yield.

Treatment
barban (0.175 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most consistent increases in grain yield were obtained from dichlofop methyl (0.75 kg ha-1), difenzoquat (0.75 kg ha-1) and barban (0.175 kg ha-1) when applied prior to the tillering stage of the wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlofop methyl during tillering usually did not increase grain yield.

Treatment
dichlofop methyle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
With a few exceptionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a few exceptions, dichlofop methyl, difenzoquat, and flamprop-methyl (0.45 kg ha-1) applied during tillering did not increase grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenzoquat during tillering usually did not increase grain yield.

Treatment
difenzoquate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a few exceptions, dichlofop methyl, difenzoquat, and flamprop-methyl (0.45 kg ha-1) applied during tillering did not increase grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flamprop-methyl during tillering usually did not increase grain yield.

Treatment
flamprop-methyl (0.45 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a few exceptions, dichlofop methyl, difenzoquat, and flamprop-methyl (0.45 kg ha-1) applied during tillering did not increase grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher difenzoquat rate gave little yield advantage except in two trials.

Treatment
Difenzoquate0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no advantagee0
Comparator
higher ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Difenzoquat and flamprop-methyl were also evaluated at 1.5 and 0.9 kg ha-1 respectively. Apart from a small yield increase in two trials there was no advantage from these higher rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher flamprop-methyl rate gave little yield advantage except in two trials.

Treatment
flamprop-methyle0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no advantagee0
Comparator
higher ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Difenzoquat and flamprop-methyl were also evaluated at 1.5 and 0.9 kg ha-1 respectively. Apart from a small yield increase in two trials there was no advantage from these higher rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlofop methyl at 0.5 kg ha-1 was less effective than 0.75 kg ha-1 in one of two trials.

Treatment
dichlofop methyl a rate of 0.5 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Qualifier
one of two trials in 1976e0
Comparator
0.75 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For dichlofop methyl a rate of 0.5 kg ha-1 was less effective than 0.75 kg ha-1 in one of two trials in 1976.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flamprop-methyl reduced Kite wheat height in weed-free trials.

Material
Kitee0
Treatment
flamprop-methyle0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
weed-free trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In weed-free trials, flamprop-methyl reduced the height and grain yield of the cultivar Kite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flamprop-methyl reduced Kite wheat grain yield in weed-free trials.

Material
Kitee0
Treatment
flamprop-methyle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In weed-free trials, flamprop-methyl reduced the height and grain yield of the cultivar Kite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flamprop-methyl had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.

Treatment
flamprop-methylt0
Outcome
little or no effecte0
Direction
little or no effecte0
Comparator
five other wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kite damage occurred with end-of-tillering application, but not early-tillering application.

Material
Kitee2
Treatment
flamprop-methyle0
Outcome
damagee0
Comparator
early tillering stagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The damage occurred when flamprop-methyl was applied at the end of tillering, but not at the early tillering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑
e2

“In weed-free trials, flamprop-methyl reduced the height and grain yield of the cultivar Kite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide performance should not be judged only by wild-oat effects because grain yield can rise with moderate weed control.

Outcome
herbicide performance should not be judged only by the effect on the wild oatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in grain yield can occur when the effect on the wild oats has been only moderate, so herbicide performance should not be judged only by the effect on the wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Post-emergence control of wild oats in Queensland with difenzoquat, flamprop-methyl, dichlofop methyl and barban”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“but had little or no effect on five other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1508 · show in text ↑

Difenzoquat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

barban · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

methyl · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Difenzoquat · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.