Abstract
SUMMARY English isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens from cherry were sensitive to the bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84 in vitro , and simultaneous inoculation of the two organisms into tomato stems or cherry leaf scars completely inhibited the gall formation that occurred in the absence of strain 84. However, attempts to achieve biological control of crown gall of cherry in the field were successful only when the antagonist was applied as a preplanting treatment to cuttings. Disease on infected cherry layers was not reduced even after three sprays of the antagonist. A. radiobacter strain 84 was also ineffective as a preplanting dip, or both preplanting and post‐harvest dips for symptomless, but latently infected, rootstocks harvested from an infected layer bed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
English A. tumefaciens isolates from cherry were sensitive to bacteriocin from A. radiobacter strain 84 in vitro.
- Taxon
- cherrye0
- Interactor
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen - Second interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens from cherry were sensitivee0
- Setting
- in vitroe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“English isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens from cherry were sensitive to the bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84 in vitro”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous inoculation with the two bacteria completely inhibited gall formation in tomato stems.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- simultaneous inoculation of the two organismse0
- Interactor
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciense1pathogen - Second interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- gall formatione0
- Direction
- completely inhibitede0
- Comparator
- absence of strain 84e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“simultaneous inoculation of the two organisms into tomato stems or cherry leaf scars completely inhibited the gall formation that occurred in the absence of strain 84”
e1“Agrobacterium tumefaciens from cherry were sensitive to the bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous inoculation completely inhibited gall formation in cherry leaf scars.
- Taxon
- cherrye0
- Treatment
- simultaneous inoculation of the two organismse0
- Interactor
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciense1pathogen - Second interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- gall formatione0
- Direction
- completely inhibitede0
- Comparator
- absence of strain 84e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“simultaneous inoculation of the two organisms into tomato stems or cherry leaf scars completely inhibited the gall formation that occurred in the absence of strain 84”
e1“Agrobacterium tumefaciens from cherry were sensitive to the bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84”
Claim · model-written summary
Field biological control of cherry crown gall succeeded only with antagonist preplanting treatment of cuttings.
- Taxon
- cherrye0
- Treatment
- preplanting treatment to cuttingse0
- Interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- biological control of crown galle0
- Direction
- successfule0
- Setting
- in the fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“biological control of crown gall of cherry in the field were successful only when the antagonist was applied as a preplanting treatment to cuttings”
e1“bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84 in vitro”
Claim · model-written summary
Three antagonist sprays did not reduce disease on infected cherry layers.
- Taxon
- cherrye0
- Treatment
- three sprays of the antagoniste0
- Interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Disease on infected cherry layerse0
- Direction
- not reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Disease on infected cherry layers was not reduced even after three sprays of the antagonist.”
e1“bacteriocin produced by A. radiobacter strain 84 in vitro”
Claim · model-written summary
A preplanting dip with strain 84 was ineffective for latently infected rootstocks.
- Taxon
- rootstockse0
- Treatment
- preplanting dipe0
- Interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- ineffectivee0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A. radiobacter strain 84 was also ineffective as a preplanting dip, or both preplanting and post‐harvest dips for symptomless, but latently infected, rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined preplanting and post-harvest dips with strain 84 were ineffective for latently infected rootstocks.
- Taxon
- rootstockse0
- Treatment
- both preplanting and post‐harvest dipse0
- Interactor
- A. radiobacter strain 84
Agrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- ineffectivee0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A. radiobacter strain 84 was also ineffective as a preplanting dip, or both preplanting and post‐harvest dips for symptomless, but latently infected, rootstocks”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Agrobacterium tumefaciens · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.