Agrobacterium radiobacter 6 claims

species · family Rhizobiaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Common name: Agrobacterium genomosp. 4 — Also written in claims: Rhizobium radiobacter — NCBI synonyms: Achromobacter radiobacter · Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) · Alcaligenes radiobacter · Bacillus radiobacter · Bacterium radiobacter · Beijerinckia fluminensis

3 spellings

Agrobacterium radiobacter · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

6 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochemical and physiological tests revealed differences between R. radiobacter isolates

Taxon: Rhizobium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Outcome: differences between isolatese7

Verbatim

e7
“Biochemical and physiological tests revealed the differences between isolates”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1625

e0
“Rhizobium radiobacter is a significant causal agent that ranks among the top ten bacteria”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89

Title

Pathogenicity of Different Rhizobium radiobacter (Agrobacterium tumefaciens) Isolates and Their Identification with Conventional Methods

Nasibe TEKİNER; Recep KOTAN Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 2021. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.976158

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Representatives of Pattern-A and Pattern-B were assigned to A. radiobacter.

Taxon: A. radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Gene: 16S rDNA and recAe0
Outcome: assigned representative isolates of Pattern-A (n: 4) and Pattern-B (n: 6) to A. radiobactere0

Verbatim

e0
“Phylogenetic analyses depending on nucleotide sequences of 16S rDNA and recA genes assigned representative isolates of Pattern-A (n: 4) and Pattern-B (n: 6) to A. radiobacter.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1160

Title

Molecular Characterization of Some Saprophyte Agrobacterium spp. Strains Isolated from Root Nodules of C. arietinum L. Cultivated in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey

Cem Tolga GÜRKANLI Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 2020. doi:10.35229/jaes.744909

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study presents the first identified root-endophytic A. radiobacter isolates from chickpea nodules in Central Anatolia and the first Turkish molecular data for this species.

Taxon: Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Interactor: C. arietinum L.e0host
Outcome: phylogenetically identified root-endophytice0
Qualifier: firste0
Setting: Central Anatolia part of Turkeye0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“As a result, this study presents the first phylogenetically identified root-endophytic Agrobacterium radiobacter and A. nepotum isolates from root nodules of C. arietinum L. grown in Central Anatolia part of Turkey. Additionally the first molecular data of A. radiobacter for Turkey also presented.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1560

Title

Molecular Characterization of Some Saprophyte Agrobacterium spp. Strains Isolated from Root Nodules of C. arietinum L. Cultivated in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey

Cem Tolga GÜRKANLI Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 2020. doi:10.35229/jaes.744909

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect None of the isolates produced nodules or pathogenic gall or hairy-root effects on the original host.
Observation All isolates were interpreted as root endophytic bacteria.
Observation PCR amplification of nodD and virA yielded no bands.
Observation The isolates were interpreted as lacking symbiotic and pathogenicity plasmids needed for nodulation or virulence.
Observation TP-RAPD distinguished three genetically distinct isolate groups.
Observation Representatives of Pattern-A and Pattern-B were assigned to A. radiobacter.
Observation The Pattern-C representative was related to A. nepotum.
Method / resource The study presents the first identified root-endophytic A. nepotum isolates from chickpea nodules in Central Anatolia.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain K1026 controlled crown gall as effectively as strain K84.

Taxon: Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Treatment: strain K1026e2
Interactor: pathogenic agrobacteriae4pathogen
Second interactor: strain K1026e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome: crown galle2
Direction: no_changeinferrede2
Comparator: strain K84e2

Verbatim

e0
“Crown gall has been successfully controlled on a commercial scale for over 15 years by the use of Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–300

e2
“Strain K1026 controls crown gall as effectively as strain K84”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–738

e4
“the possibility of transfer of the agrocin plasmid, pAgK84, to pathogenic agrobacteria, making them resistant to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–481

Title

Biological Control of Crown Gall Using Agrobacterium Strains K84 and K1026

H Maarten; A. David 1991

Other claims from this paper (2)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Transfer-deficient deletion mutant K1026 of pAgK84 can no longer transfer its agrocin plasmid to other agrobacteria.

Taxon: Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Outcome: agrocin plasmid (pAgK1026) can no longer be transferred to other agrobacteriae1
Comparator: pAgK84e1

Verbatim

e0
“Crown gall has been successfully controlled on a commercial scale for over 15 years by the use of Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–300

e1
“The construction of a transfer-deficient deletion mutant of pAgK84 has resulted in a strain (K1026) from which the agrocin plasmid (pAgK1026) can no longer be transferred to other agrobacteria”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–675

Title

Biological Control of Crown Gall Using Agrobacterium Strains K84 and K1026

H Maarten; A. David 1991

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Strain K1026 controlled crown gall as effectively as strain K84.
Recommendation The authors suggest K1026 may be used to minimise the danger of breakdown of biological control.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest K1026 may be used to minimise the danger of breakdown of biological control.

Taxon: Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0
Outcome: danger of breakdown of biological control is minimisede3

Verbatim

e0
“Crown gall has been successfully controlled on a commercial scale for over 15 years by the use of Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–300

e3
“may be used to ensure that the danger of breakdown of biological control is minimised”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–828

Title

Biological Control of Crown Gall Using Agrobacterium Strains K84 and K1026

H Maarten; A. David 1991

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Strain K1026 controlled crown gall as effectively as strain K84.
Method / resource Transfer-deficient deletion mutant K1026 of pAgK84 can no longer transfer its agrocin plasmid to other agrobacteria.