Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

Grafting Tomato with Interspecific Rootstock to Manage Diseases Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and Southern Root-Knot Nematode

C. L. Rivard; S. O'Connell; M. M. Peet; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
96
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) throughout the southeastern United States. Grafting is an emerging technology in U.S. tomato production, and growers require information regarding the resistance characteristics conferred by rootstocks. In this study, southern blight (SB) and root-knot nematodes (RKN) were effectively managed using interspecific hybrid rootstocks. During 2007 and 2008, field trials were carried out at two locations that had soils naturally infested with S. rolfsii. At the end of the growing seasons, the mean SB incidence of nongrafted plants was 27 and 79% at the two sites. SB incidence among plants grafted onto rootstock cultivars Big Power (one location only), Beaufort, and Maxifort ranged from 0 to 5%, and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) values were lower than for nongrafted and self-grafted controls (P < 0.01). At one location, soils were naturally infested with RKN, and all three rootstocks reduced RKN AUDPC and RKN soil populations at first harvest (P < 0.01). Big Power was particularly effective at reducing RKN galling and RKN soil populations at final fruit harvest (P < 0.01). Fruit yield was higher when resistant rootstocks were utilized (P < 0.05), and in our study grafting was effective at maintaining crop productivity in soils infested with S. rolfsii and M. incognita.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had lower southern blight incidence (0 to 5%) than nongrafted plants.

Treatment
grafted onto rootstock cultivars Big Powere1
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
SB incidencee1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
0 to 5%e1
Comparator
nongrafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“SB incidence among plants grafted onto rootstock cultivars Big Power (one location only), Beaufort, and Maxifort ranged from 0 to 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–842 · show in text ↑
e2

“the mean SB incidence of nongrafted plants was 27 and 79% at the two sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had lower southern blight AUDPC than nongrafted and self-grafted controls.

Treatment
graftede1
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) valuese3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
nongrafted and self-grafted controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“SB incidence among plants grafted onto rootstock cultivars Big Power (one location only), Beaufort, and Maxifort ranged from 0 to 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–842 · show in text ↑
e3

“area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) values were lower than for nongrafted and self-grafted controls (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three rootstocks reduced root-knot nematode AUDPC and soil populations at first harvest.

Treatment
all three rootstockse4
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
RKN AUDPC and RKN soil populations at first harveste4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“all three rootstocks reduced RKN AUDPC and RKN soil populations at first harvest (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Big Power was particularly effective at reducing root-knot nematode galling and soil populations at final fruit harvest.

Material
Big Powere5
Treatment
Big Powere5
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
RKN galling and RKN soil populations at final fruit harveste5
Direction
reducinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“Big Power was particularly effective at reducing RKN galling and RKN soil populations at final fruit harvest (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield was higher with resistant rootstocks.

Treatment
resistant rootstockse6
Outcome
Fruit yielde6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit yield was higher when resistant rootstocks were utilized (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting was effective at maintaining tomato crop productivity in soils infested with S. rolfsii and M. incognita.

Treatment
graftinge7
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie7pathogen
Second interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae7pest
Outcome
crop productivitye7
Direction
effective at maintaininge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · Second interactorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause severe damage to fresh-market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“grafting was effective at maintaining crop productivity in soils infested with S. rolfsii and M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1443 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

grafting · Agroathelia rolfsii · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.