Abstract
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and suppressed the Fusarium wilt of tomato. The chemical fungicide, benomyl, did not suppress the disease incidence at low concentrations. However, the disease incidence was decreased by the combined application of benomyl at low concentrations with strain LRB3W1. Combined application of benomyl with the bacterium was more effective than treatment with the bacterium alone. The survival of strain LRB3W1 was not influenced by the presence of benomyl. This combined use of the biocontrol bacterium, strain LRB3W1, and a fungicide, benomyl, should be an attractive approach for suppressing tomato wilt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1e0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen - Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- mycelial growthe0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and suppressed the Fusarium wilt of tomato”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1 suppressed Fusarium wilt of tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1e0
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Fusarium wilte0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LRB3W1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and suppressed the Fusarium wilt of tomato”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
The chemical fungicide benomyl at low concentrations alone did not suppress tomato disease incidence.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chemical fungicide, benomyle1
- Outcome
- disease incidencee1
- Direction
- did not suppresse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The chemical fungicide, benomyl, did not suppress the disease incidence at low concentrations”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined benomyl at low concentrations with strain LRB3W1 decreased tomato disease incidence.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combined application of benomyl at low concentrations with strain LRB3W1e2
- Outcome
- disease incidencee2
- Direction
- decreasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the disease incidence was decreased by the combined application of benomyl at low concentrations with strain LRB3W1”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined benomyl with the bacterium was more effective than the bacterium alone.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Combined application of benomyl with the bacteriume3
- Outcome
- more effectivee3
- Direction
- more effectivee3
- Comparator
- treatment with the bacterium alonee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Combined application of benomyl with the bacterium was more effective than treatment with the bacterium alone”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Survival of strain LRB3W1 was not influenced by benomyl.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- presence of benomyle4
- Interactor
- strain LRB3W1e4biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- survival of strain LRB3W1e4
- Direction
- not influencede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The survival of strain LRB3W1 was not influenced by the presence of benomyl”
t0“Tomato Fusarium Wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined use of the biocontrol bacterium LRB3W1 and benomyl should be an attractive approach for suppressing tomato wilt.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume5
- Treatment
- combined use of the biocontrol bacterium, strain LRB3W1, and a fungicide, benomyle5
- Outcome
- suppressing tomato wilte5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“This combined use of the biocontrol bacterium, strain LRB3W1, and a fungicide, benomyl, should be an attractive approach for suppressing tomato wilt”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →benomyl · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Pseudomonas fluorescens · Fusarium · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fungicide · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.