Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the biocontrol of fusarium wilt in tomato and flax

TOUA Dalila; BENCHABANE Messaoud; BENSAID Fatiha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium oxysporum is an abundant plant pathogen in the soil and is found in the rhizosphere of many plant species. The fungus has numerous formae speciales (f.sp.) that infect and cause wilt diseases of a variety of host plants. F. oxysporum f.sp lycopersici (Fol) and F. oxysporum f.sp lini (Foln) are known to infect tomato and flax, respectively. Fluorescent pseudomonads can suppress various soilborne diseases, and their efficacy has been related both to their antagonistic activities and to their rhizosphere competitiveness. In this study, the biocontrol capacity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens against fusarium wilt of tomato and flax was evaluated both in vitro and in planta. The P. fluorescens strains exhibited substantial antagonistic activities against the two fungal isolates on three culture media tested: King B (KB), potato dextrose agar (PDA) and a mixture of both (KB + PDA). As compared to the untreated control, the mycelial growth decreased by 8.33 to 49.33%. Conidial germination and germ tube elongation were significantly inhibited and reduced, respectively, by 6.15 to 47.33% and by 1.63 to 45.45%. In bioassay trials, P. fluorescens strains significantly reduced the disease incidence and severity by 4.86 to 74.49% on tomato plants and 3.93 to 79.19% on flax plants. The different efficacy of the biocontrol agents could be due to the influence of several factors, including the efficiency of the strain, the type of pathogen and the host. Key words: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), Pseudomonas fluorescens, fusarium wilt, tomato, flax, biocontrol.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens strains antagonized both fungal isolates on three media.

Interactor
fungal isolatese0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P. fluorescens strains exhibited substantial antagonistic activities against the two fungal isolates on three culture media tested: King B (KB), potato dextrose agar (PDA) and a mixture of both (KB + PDA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycelial growth fell 8.33 to 49.33% relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescenst0
Interactor
fusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.33 to 49.33%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the untreated control, the mycelial growth decreased by 8.33 to 49.33%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the biocontrol of fusarium wilt in tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial germination was inhibited by 6.15 to 47.33%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescenst0
Interactor
fusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Conidial germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
6.15 to 47.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conidial germination and germ tube elongation were significantly inhibited and reduced, respectively, by 6.15 to 47.33% and by 1.63 to 45.45%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the biocontrol of fusarium wilt in tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germ tube elongation was reduced by 1.63 to 45.45%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescenst0
Interactor
fusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germ tube elongatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.63 to 45.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conidial germination and germ tube elongation were significantly inhibited and reduced, respectively, by 6.15 to 47.33% and by 1.63 to 45.45%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the biocontrol of fusarium wilt in tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens reduced tomato disease incidence and severity by 4.86 to 74.49%.

Treatment
P. fluorescens strainse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.86 to 74.49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescens strains significantly reduced the disease incidence and severity by 4.86 to 74.49% on tomato plants and 3.93 to 79.19% on flax plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“fusarium wilt in tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens reduced flax disease incidence and severity by 3.93 to 79.19%.

Treatment
P. fluorescens strainse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.93 to 79.19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescens strains significantly reduced the disease incidence and severity by 4.86 to 74.49% on tomato plants and 3.93 to 79.19% on flax plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“fusarium wilt in tomato and flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Fusarium · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.