Paper · 2014 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Essential oils for the control of bacterial speck in tomato crop

Érika Oliveira da Silva; Samuel Julio Martins; Eduardo Alves

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) is considered one of the major diseases of tomato crop worldwide and alternative methods to control it are desirable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of essential oils (EOs) on P. syringae pv. tomato strain ufv-1 growth, in controlling bacterial speck in tomato plants, as well as to find the best application time of the EOs. The EOs used in this study were thyme (TH), eucalyptus (EU), tea tree (TT), clove (CL), cinnamon (CN), citronella (CI), and lemon grass (LE). An in vitro test using EOs were conducted to verify the ufv-1 inhibition, and two tests were carried out in a greenhouse to evaluate the effect of EOs before and after inoculation with Pst. Inhibition zones were observed for EU, CI, CL, and CN at a concentration of 1%. Plants pre-treated with EOs showed lower disease severity than that in plants post-treated with EOs (P<0.05), whereas higher efficacy was observed using acibenzolar-S-methyl and CI (91 and 83%, respectively). Regarding post-treatment, TT, TH, CI, EU, LE, and commercial fungicide, resulted in reducing disease severity by 8 to 40% compared to control (water). Results from this study showed the potential use of EOs in controlling bacterial speck in tomato and suggest the induced resistance as the major mode of action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus, citronella, clove, and cinnamon oils at 1% inhibited the pathogen in vitro.

Treatment
EU, CI, CL, and CN at a concentration of 1%e0
Interactor
P. syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe1pathogen
Outcome
Inhibition zonese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition zones were observed for EU, CI, CL, and CN at a concentration of 1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. syringae pv. tomato strain ufv-1 growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–292 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-treatment with essential oils produced lower tomato disease severity than post-treatment.

Treatment
pre-treated with EOse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
post-treated with EOse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pre-treated with EOs showed lower disease severity than that in plants post-treated with EOs (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acibenzolar-S-methyl pre-treatment had 91% efficacy against bacterial speck.

Treatment
acibenzolar-S-methyle0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
highere0
Value
91e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher efficacy was observed using acibenzolar-S-methyl and CI (91 and 83%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citronella pre-treatment had 83% efficacy against bacterial speck.

Treatment
CIe0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
highere0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher efficacy was observed using acibenzolar-S-methyl and CI (91 and 83%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-treatment with tea tree, thyme, citronella, eucalyptus, lemon grass oils or commercial fungicide reduced disease severity by 8 to 40% versus water.

Treatment
TT, TH, CI, EU, LE, and commercial fungicidee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
8 to 40%e0
Comparator
control (water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding post-treatment, TT, TH, CI, EU, LE, and commercial fungicide, resulted in reducing disease severity by 8 to 40% compared to control (water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed induced resistance as the main mode of action of essential oils.

Treatment
essential oils (EOs)e1
Outcome
induced resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggest the induced resistance as the major mode of action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“essential oils (EOs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–246 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑

Cymbopogon citratus · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 146 positive, 14 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.