Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Planting Dates on Growth, Yield and Physiological Traits of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.), and Field Evaluation for Heat Tolerance

A. El-Shaieny; T. Bashandy

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Egypt, okra is one of the most common summer vegetable crops. High temperature is affecting significantly on okra growth, yield and fruit quality. The purpose of this study was to examine the genetic diversity of fifteen okra cultivars grown at three different planting dates. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block with spilt plot, incorporated three replications. In the 2018 and 2019 seasons, seeds of okra cultivars were planted on 1st March (normal), 1st April (slightly late) and 1st May (late). The results revealed that planting dates had a significant impact on growth and yield characteristics. All of the growth, yield, and yield components studied traits, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, fresh pod weight, total pod yield, as well as physiological trait, chlorophyll content index, were significantly reduced by late planting date on May 1st, which had extreme high temperature (> 46oC). While relative cell injury (RCI%) increased significantly. The current study's findings indicate that relative cell injury (RCI%) could be used as an effective selection criteria for selecting the cultivars with lower value of (RCI%). Also, supports the hypotheses since some okra cultivars i.e., Qena-1, Qena-2, Luxor, Qena-3 and Aswan have outstanding performance in high-temperature environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting on 1 May reduced plant height, number of branches and number of pods per plant in okra compared with the normal 1 March planting.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material
fifteen okra cultivarse3
Treatment
late planting date on May 1ste1
Outcome
plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plante1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
1st March (normal)e2
Setting
Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Egypt, okra is one of the most common summer vegetable crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“All of the growth, yield, and yield components studied traits, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, fresh pod weight, total pod yield, as well as physiological trait, chlorophyll content index, were significantly reduced by late planting date on May 1st, which had extreme high temperature (> 46oC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–956 · show in text ↑
e2

“seeds of okra cultivars were planted on 1st March (normal), 1st April (slightly late) and 1st May (late)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–523 · show in text ↑
e3

“examine the genetic diversity of fifteen okra cultivars grown at three different planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting on 1 May reduced fresh pod weight and total pod yield in okra compared with the normal 1 March planting.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
late planting date on May 1ste1
Outcome
fresh pod weight, total pod yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
1st March (normal)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“All of the growth, yield, and yield components studied traits, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, fresh pod weight, total pod yield, as well as physiological trait, chlorophyll content index, were significantly reduced by late planting date on May 1st, which had extreme high temperature (> 46oC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–956 · show in text ↑
e2

“seeds of okra cultivars were planted on 1st March (normal), 1st April (slightly late) and 1st May (late)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting on 1 May reduced the chlorophyll content index in okra compared with the normal 1 March planting.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
late planting date on May 1ste1
Outcome
chlorophyll content indexe1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
1st March (normal)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“All of the growth, yield, and yield components studied traits, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, fresh pod weight, total pod yield, as well as physiological trait, chlorophyll content index, were significantly reduced by late planting date on May 1st, which had extreme high temperature (> 46oC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–956 · show in text ↑
e2

“seeds of okra cultivars were planted on 1st March (normal), 1st April (slightly late) and 1st May (late)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting on 1 May increased relative cell injury (RCI%) in okra, compared with the normal 1 March planting.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
late planting date on May 1ste1
Outcome
relative cell injury (RCI%)e4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
1st March (normal)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“All of the growth, yield, and yield components studied traits, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, fresh pod weight, total pod yield, as well as physiological trait, chlorophyll content index, were significantly reduced by late planting date on May 1st, which had extreme high temperature (> 46oC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–956 · show in text ↑
e2

“seeds of okra cultivars were planted on 1st March (normal), 1st April (slightly late) and 1st May (late)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–523 · show in text ↑
e4

“While relative cell injury (RCI%) increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1015 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Relative cell injury (RCI%) could be used as an effective selection criterion for choosing okra cultivars with a lower RCI% value.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Outcome
effective selection criteriae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“relative cell injury (RCI%) could be used as an effective selection criteria for selecting the cultivars with lower value of (RCI%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra cultivars Qena-1, Qena-2, Luxor, Qena-3 and Aswan performed outstandingly in high-temperature environments.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material
Qena-1, Qena-2, Luxor, Qena-3 and Aswane6
Outcome
outstanding performance in high-temperature environmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“some okra cultivars i.e., Qena-1, Qena-2, Luxor, Qena-3 and Aswan have outstanding performance in high-temperature environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1355 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.