Paper · 2013 · Food Security

Application of meta-analysis in plant pathology: a case study examining the impact of fungicides on wheat yield loss from the yellow spot—septoria nodorum blotch disease complex in Western Australia

Kawsar P. Salam; Geoff J. Thomas; Ciara Beard; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This work was done to demonstrate the opportunities provided by application of meta-analysis in plant pathology. It was a case study used to determine the effectiveness of foliar fungicides in minimising yield loss from a complex of yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) and septoria nodorum blotch (Stagonospora nodorum, teleomorph: Phaeosphaeria nodorum) (YS-SNB disease complex) on wheat in the northern grain-belt of Western Australia. Forty-seven datasets of experimental results from 14 growing seasons, using 18 varieties sprayed one to three times, predominantly with tebuconazole or propiconazole fungicides, were analysed. Across the datasets, the wheat yield gain from fungicide application was 297 kg ha−1 with a 95 % confidence interval of 11.6 kg ha−1. Significant yield gains resulted from single or multiple applications of fungicides. Both propiconazole and tebuconazole, increased yield of wheat affected by the YS–SNB disease complex, with yield gain from propiconazole being greater than that from tebuconazole. Yield response varied significantly among crop growing seasons. Meta-analysis was able to aggregate a large number of experimental results and answer important questions related to the variables that influenced those results; in this case the effectiveness of fungicides in minimising yield loss from the YS-SNB disease complex on wheat. It also identified areas where further research needs to be done. It is concluded that meta-analysis has the potential to contribute to similar analyses in other crop disease systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased wheat yield by 297 kg ha−1 across datasets.

Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
gaine0
Value
297 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
95 % confidence interval of 11.6 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across the datasets, the wheat yield gain from fungicide application was 297 kg ha−1 with a 95 % confidence interval of 11.6 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single fungicide applications gave significant yield gains.

Treatment
singlee0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield gains resulted from single or multiple applications of fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple fungicide applications gave significant yield gains.

Treatment
multiple applications of fungicidese0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield gains resulted from single or multiple applications of fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole increased yield of diseased wheat.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
YS–SNB disease complexe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both propiconazole and tebuconazole, increased yield of wheat affected by the YS–SNB disease complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole increased yield of diseased wheat.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
YS–SNB disease complexe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both propiconazole and tebuconazole, increased yield of wheat affected by the YS–SNB disease complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole gave a larger yield gain than tebuconazole.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
tebuconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield gain from propiconazole being greater than that from tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield response varied significantly among growing seasons.

Outcome
Yield responsee0
Setting
crop growing seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield response varied significantly among crop growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meta-analysis aggregated experimental results to assess fungicide effectiveness and identify further research needs.

Outcome
answer important questionse0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meta-analysis was able to aggregate a large number of experimental results and answer important questions related to the variables that influenced those results; in this case the effectiveness of fungicides in minimising yield loss from the YS-SNB disease complex on wheat. It also identified areas where further research needs to be done”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1439 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

tebuconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.