Paper · 2014 · Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

Salinity and Drought Induced Antioxidant Responses in Different Cultivars of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

Sadia Javed; Muhammad Ashraf; Munazzah Meraj; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six cultivars of safflower which were (PI-387820, PI-251978, PI-170274, PI-387821, PI-386174 and Thori-78) grown in net house of NIAB under salinity (10 ds m⁻¹) and drought (60% field capacity) conditions and compared to their oxidative damage and antioxidative responses. Plant samples (leaves) were collected for the determination of malonidialdehyde (MDA), antioxidative enzymes (catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidase), proline, and photosynthetic pigments. Salinity and drought decreased the chlorophyll a and b contents but a decrease in chlorophyll a and b was less in safflower variety (THORI-78) which could be a useful marker for selecting a stress tolerant variety. Both stresses considerable increases the accumulation of proline in PI-251978, PI-170274, PI-387821, PI-386174 and THORI-78 varieties of safflower whereas the proline accumulation did not appear to be an essential part of the protection mechanism against salinity and drought in variety PI-387820. Enzyme activity measurements revealed that THORI-78 can tolerate salinity and drought stress well by increasing the activity of catalase and APX enzymes whereas variety PI- 386174 showed increased activity of glutathione reductase enzyme under salinity and drought and appear to be very crucial antioxidative defenses during intense stress conditions. The results indicate that the photosynthetic pigments, proline and activities of the enzymes are important mechanism for the stress tolerance in safflower plant and can be considered as genetic improvement for the plant in salinity and drought soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and drought decreased chlorophyll a and b in safflower.

Treatment
Salinity and droughte0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salinity and drought decreased the chlorophyll a and b contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b decreased less in THORI-78.

Material
THORI-78e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“a decrease in chlorophyll a and b was less in safflower variety (THORI-78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both stresses increased proline accumulation in five safflower varieties.

Material
PI-251978, PI-170274, PI-387821, PI-386174 and THORI-78e0
Treatment
Both stressese0
Outcome
accumulation of prolinee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stresses considerable increases the accumulation of proline in PI-251978, PI-170274, PI-387821, PI-386174 and THORI-78 varieties of safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–854 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation did not appear essential to stress protection in PI-387820.

Material
PI-387820e0
Outcome
protection mechanism against salinity and droughte0
Qualifier
did not appear to be an essential parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline accumulation did not appear to be an essential part of the protection mechanism against salinity and drought in variety PI-387820”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

THORI-78 increased catalase and APX activity under salinity and drought.

Material
THORI-78e0
Treatment
salinity and drought stresse0
Outcome
activity of catalase and APX enzymese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“THORI-78 can tolerate salinity and drought stress well by increasing the activity of catalase and APX enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI- 386174 increased glutathione reductase activity under salinity and drought.

Material
PI- 386174e0
Treatment
salinity and droughte0
Outcome
activity of glutathione reductase enzymee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety PI- 386174 showed increased activity of glutathione reductase enzyme under salinity and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose pigments, proline and enzyme activities as stress tolerance mechanisms in safflower.

Outcome
stress tolerancee0
Qualifier
photosynthetic pigments, proline and activities of the enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic pigments, proline and activities of the enzymes are important mechanism for the stress tolerance in safflower plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1518 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.