Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Physiological response of safflower to water deficit and genome-wide identification of its NAC transcription factor family

Jialing Yang; Long Han; Xueyi Zhao; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Accumulated evidence demonstrated the major role of NAC transcription factors in plants response to drought stress. However, there are limited studies on the identification of safflower NAC genes and their functions in response to abiotic stress, i.e., water deficit. In the present study, a total of 85 CtNACs were identified and categorized into 17 subfamilies, and the vast majority of the CtNACs were annotated in biological process. Their promoters contained cis-regulatory elements related to light, hormonal and stress responses, and plant development. Moreover, physiological response of safflower to water deficit was assessed. Plant growth of safflower was downregulated during water deficit. The contents of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline), reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and antioxidant enzymes activities, i.e., superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase in safflower leaves were enhanced under water deficit. Additionally, the photosynthetic pigments in safflower were decreased during water stress. Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR detection revealed that the expression levels of most CtNACs were upregulated under water deficit, indicating that these genes may involved in the response of safflower to water deficit. These data facilitate the in-depth study of the biological functions of CtNACs and the breeding of drought-tolerant safflower varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighty-five CtNACs were identified in 17 subfamilies.

Gene
CtNACse0
Outcome
CtNACs were identified and categorized into 17 subfamiliese0
Value
85 CtNACse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a total of 85 CtNACs were identified and categorized into 17 subfamilies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–362 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most CtNACs were annotated in biological process.

Gene
CtNACse0
Outcome
annotated in biological processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the vast majority of the CtNACs were annotated in biological process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CtNAC promoters contained cis-regulatory elements related to light, hormones, stress and development.

Outcome
promoters contained cis-regulatory elementse0
Qualifier
light, hormonal and stress responses, and plant developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their promoters contained cis-regulatory elements related to light, hormonal and stress responses, and plant development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced safflower growth.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
downregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth of safflower was downregulated during water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased osmotic adjustment substances in safflower leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline), reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and antioxidant enzymes activities, i.e., superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase in safflower leaves were enhanced under water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide in safflower leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline), reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and antioxidant enzymes activities, i.e., superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase in safflower leaves were enhanced under water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased SOD, peroxidase and catalase activities in safflower leaves.

Treatment
water deficite0
Gene
superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalasee0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant enzymes activities, i.e., superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase in safflower leaves were enhanced under water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigments decreased during safflower water stress.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic pigments in safflower were decreased during water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most CtNAC expression levels increased under water deficit.

Treatment
water deficite0
Gene
CtNACse0
Outcome
expression levels of most CtNACse0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the expression levels of most CtNACs were upregulated under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 1 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.