Paper · 1977 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Biology and Control of Diparopsis watersi in the Nuba Mountains Area of Western Sudan1

Yousif M. El Tayeb

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Some aspects of the biology of Diparopsis watersi (Rothschild) were investigated in the Nuba Mountains area in western Sudan from 1967–70. The mean incubation period of eggs varied from 3.4 days in Aug. and early Sept. to 5.5 days in Oct. and Nov., the differences being attributable to variations in ambient temperatures. The mean larval duration during Sept. and Oct. was 2.7 days for the 1st instar, 2 days for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th instars, and 4.3 days for the 5th instar. The rate of growth in successive larval instars was ca. 1.6. The majority of pupae occurred 2.5–15.0 cm deep in the soil. Oviposition was heaviest during the 1st 2 nights after moth emergence. The maximum number of eggs laid/female moth was 242. Population studies indicate a negative correlation between the amount and earliness of rainfall and the abundance of D. watersi. Carbaryl at 2-lb AI/feddan (1.04 acre) gave good control of D. watersi larvae and increased cotton yield by 40%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall amount and earliness were negatively correlated with D. watersi abundance.

Interactor
D. watersie0pest
Outcome
abundance of D. watersie0
Direction
negativee0
Setting
rainfalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlation between the amount and earliness of rainfall and the abundance of D. watersi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl controlled D. watersi larvae.

Treatment
Carbaryl at 2-lb AI/feddane0
Interactor
D. watersie0pest
Outcome
control of D. watersi larvaee0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbaryl at 2-lb AI/feddan (1.04 acre) gave good control of D. watersi larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl increased cotton yield by 40%.

Treatment
Carbaryl at 2-lb AI/feddane0
Interactor
D. watersie0pest
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbaryl at 2-lb AI/feddan (1.04 acre) gave good control of D. watersi larvae and increased cotton yield by 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–963 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbaryl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.