Paper · 2012 · The Scientific World JOURNAL

Influence of Drought and Sowing Time on Protein Composition, Antinutrients, and Mineral Contents of Wheat

Sondeep Singh; Anil K. Gupta; Narinder Kaur

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
77
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study in a two-year experiment investigated the influence of drought and sowing time on protein composition, antinutrients, and mineral contents of wheat whole meal of two genotypes differing in their water requirements. Different thermal conditions prevailing during the grain filling period under different sowing time generated a large effect on the amount of total soluble proteins. Late sown conditions offered higher protein content accompanied by increased albumin-globulin but decreased glutenin content. Fe content was increased to 20-23%; however, tannin decreased to 18-35% under early sown rain-fed conditions as compared to irrigated timely sown conditions in both the genotypes. Activity of trypsin inhibitor was decreased under rain-fed conditions in both genotypes. This study inferred that variable sowing times and irrigation practices can be used for inducing variation in different wheat whole meal quality characteristics. Lower temperature prevailing under early sown rain-fed conditions; resulted in higher protein content. Higher Fe and lower tannin contents were reported under early sown rain-fed conditions however, late sown conditions offered an increase in phytic acid accompanied by decreased micronutrients and glutenin contents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different thermal conditions during grain filling strongly affected total soluble proteins.

Treatment
different sowing timee0
Outcome
total soluble proteinse0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different thermal conditions prevailing during the grain filling period under different sowing time generated a large effect on the amount of total soluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased protein content.

Treatment
Late sown conditionse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late sown conditions offered higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased albumin-globulin content.

Treatment
Late sown conditionse0
Outcome
albumin-globuline0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late sown conditions offered higher protein content accompanied by increased albumin-globulin but decreased glutenin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased glutenin content.

Treatment
Late sown conditionse0
Outcome
glutenin contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late sown conditions offered higher protein content accompanied by increased albumin-globulin but decreased glutenin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sown rain-fed conditions increased Fe content by 20-23% relative to irrigated timely sowing.

Material
both the genotypese0
Treatment
early sown rain-fed conditionse0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20-23%e0
Comparator
irrigated timely sown conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe content was increased to 20-23%; however, tannin decreased to 18-35% under early sown rain-fed conditions as compared to irrigated timely sown conditions in both the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sown rain-fed conditions decreased tannin content to 18-35% relative to irrigated timely sowing.

Treatment
early sown rain-fed conditionse0
Outcome
tannine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18-35%e0
Comparator
irrigated timely sown conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe content was increased to 20-23%; however, tannin decreased to 18-35% under early sown rain-fed conditions as compared to irrigated timely sown conditions in both the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rain-fed conditions decreased trypsin inhibitor activity in both genotypes.

Material
both genotypese0
Treatment
rain-fed conditionse0
Outcome
Activity of trypsin inhibitore0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activity of trypsin inhibitor was decreased under rain-fed conditions in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sown rain-fed conditions with lower temperature yielded higher protein content.

Treatment
early sown rain-fed conditionse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Lower temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower temperature prevailing under early sown rain-fed conditions; resulted in higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased phytic acid.

Treatment
late sown conditionse0
Outcome
phytic acide0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late sown conditions offered an increase in phytic acid accompanied by decreased micronutrients and glutenin contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased micronutrient content.

Treatment
late sown conditionse0
Outcome
micronutrientse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late sown conditions offered an increase in phytic acid accompanied by decreased micronutrients and glutenin contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing time and irrigation practices can induce variation in wheat whole meal quality.

Treatment
variable sowing times and irrigation practicese0
Outcome
variation in different wheat whole meal quality characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variable sowing times and irrigation practices can be used for inducing variation in different wheat whole meal quality characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rainfall · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rainfall · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sowing time · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.