Paper · 2016

FERTIGATION STUDIES IN TOMATO

Sundharaiya Kalanjiyam; Karuthamani Manickam

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore. The experiment include totally seven treatments viz., Soil application of normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF (T1), Soil application of normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF and drip irrigation (T2), drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF (T3), drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 75 percent RDF (T4), drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea (T5), drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 percent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea (T6) and drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 50 percent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea (T7). The experiment was laidout in a randomized block design and replicated thrice. The results of the study revealed that drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea significantly increased the plant height, dry matter production, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weight and yield per plant. It was followed by drip fertgation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 percent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea and drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using Urea, Single Super Phosphate and Muriate of Potash. Similarly, the same treatment also recorded increased values for quality traits viz., TSS, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid content of fruits. Higher nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiency were observed by drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 perent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea and drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using Urea, Single Super Phosphate and Muriate of Potash.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 100% RDF water-soluble fertilizers significantly increased tomato plant height, dry matter production and leaf area index.

Treatment
drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Ureae1
Outcome
plant height, dry matter production, leaf area indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea significantly increased the plant height, dry matter production, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weight and yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 100% RDF water-soluble fertilizers significantly increased tomato total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plant and fruit weight.

Treatment
drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Ureae1
Outcome
total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea significantly increased the plant height, dry matter production, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weight and yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 100% RDF water-soluble fertilizers significantly increased tomato yield per plant.

Treatment
drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Ureae1
Outcome
yield per plante1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea significantly increased the plant height, dry matter production, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weight and yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased TSS, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits.

Organ / stage
fruitse3
Treatment
drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Ureae1
Outcome
TSS, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid contente3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 100 per cent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea significantly increased the plant height, dry matter production, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of fruits per plants, fruit weight and yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1178 · show in text ↑
e3

“the same treatment also recorded increased values for quality traits viz., TSS, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid content of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 75% RDF water-soluble fertilizers gave higher nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiency in tomato.

Treatment
drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 perent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Ureae2
Outcome
nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
Highere2
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiency were observed by drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 perent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea and drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using Urea, Single Super Phosphate and Muriate of Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 100% RDF normal fertilizers (urea, single super phosphate, muriate of potash) gave higher nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiency in tomato.

Treatment
drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using Urea, Single Super Phosphate and Muriate of Potashe2
Outcome
nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
Highere2
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial on fertigation studies on tomato was conducted at the Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher nutrient uptake and fertilizer use efficiency were observed by drip fertigation with water soluble fertilizers at 75 perent RDF using MAP, Multi K and Urea and drip fertigation with normal fertilizers at 100 percent RDF using Urea, Single Super Phosphate and Muriate of Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1842 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Prior mild N deficiency increased leaf sugar content under drought.

    Cross‐stress tolerance: Mild nitrogen (N) deficiency effects on drought stress response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) · 2021 · compared with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.