Paper · 1977 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Low Water Tensions in Defined Growth Stages of Processing Tomato Plants and their Effects on Yield and Quality

Jehoshua Rudich; Dov Kalmar; Chanan Geizenberg; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryIn drip irrigation experiments where water was applied daily it was found that low water tensions could be maintained in the soil to a range of 10 to 20 centibars and that these conditions had a considerable influence on yield and quality of processing tomatoes, Lycopersicon esculentum cv VF 317. The response of the plant in different growth stages to low soil water tensions was studied. Irrigation during the period of fruit set and fruit development was found to increase yield levels by 53 t ha-1 compared with non-irrigated plants. Irrigation applied only during the period of fruit development had a favourable influence on yield as well as on the efficiency of water utilization. However, irrigation at this stage had an unfavourable influence on fruit quality characteristics, namely, total soluble solids, acidity, viscosity and vitamin C. The effects of irrigation on fruit set and fruit development are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation during fruit set and fruit development increased processing tomato yield by 53 t ha-1 compared with non-irrigated plants.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Organ / stage
fruit set and fruit developmente1
Treatment
Irrigation during the period of fruit set and fruit developmente1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
53 t ha-1e1
Comparator
non-irrigated plantse1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation during the period of fruit set and fruit development was found to increase yield levels by 53 t ha-1 compared with non-irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation applied only during fruit development had a favourable influence on yield and on the efficiency of water utilization in processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
Irrigation applied only during the period of fruit developmente2
Outcome
yield as well as on the efficiency of water utilizatione2
Direction
favourable influencee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation applied only during the period of fruit development had a favourable influence on yield as well as on the efficiency of water utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at fruit development had an unfavourable influence on total soluble solids, acidity and viscosity of processing tomato fruit.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
irrigation at this stagee3
Outcome
total soluble solids, acidity, viscositye3
Direction
unfavourable influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“irrigation at this stage had an unfavourable influence on fruit quality characteristics, namely, total soluble solids, acidity, viscosity and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at fruit development had an unfavourable influence on vitamin C of processing tomato fruit.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
irrigation at this stagee3
Outcome
vitamin Ce3
Direction
unfavourable influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“irrigation at this stage had an unfavourable influence on fruit quality characteristics, namely, total soluble solids, acidity, viscosity and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining low soil water tensions of 10 to 20 centibars had a considerable influence on processing tomato yield and quality, with direction not stated.

Taxon
processing tomatoese0
Treatment
low water tensionse0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“low water tensions could be maintained in the soil to a range of 10 to 20 centibars and that these conditions had a considerable influence on yield and quality of processing tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–268 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.