Paper · 2021 · Plant-Environment Interactions

Cross‐stress tolerance: Mild nitrogen (N) deficiency effects on drought stress response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Vajiheh Safavi‐Rizi; Kora Uellendahl; Britta Öhrlein; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Climate change will lead to more frequent and severe drought periods which massively reduce crop production worldwide. Besides drought, nitrogen (N)‐deficiency is another critical threat to crop yield production. Drought and N‐deficiency both decrease photosynthesis and induce similar adaptive strategies such as longer roots, reduction of biomass, induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and antioxidative enzymes. Due to the overlapping response to N‐deficiency and drought, understanding the physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in cross‐stresses tolerance is crucial for breeding strategies and achieving multiple stress resistance and eventually more sustainable agriculture. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a mild N‐deficiency on drought stress tolerance of tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L., cv. Moneymaker). Various morphological and physiological parameters such as dry biomass, root length, water potential, SPAD values, stomatal conductance, and compatible solutes accumulation (proline and sugar) were analyzed. Moreover, the expression of ROS scavenging marker genes, cytosolic ASCORBATE PEROXIDASES ( cAPX1 , cAPX2 , and cAPX3 ), were investigated. Our results showed that a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ). The improved adaptive response was reflected in higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content. Moreover, the APX1 gene showed a higher expression level compared to control under N‐deficiency and in combination with drought in the leaf, after a one‐week recovery period. Our finding highlights a potentially positive link between a former mild N‐deficiency and subsequent drought stress response in tomato. Combining the morphological and physiological response with underlying gene regulatory networks under consecutive stress, provide a powerful tool for improving multiple stress resistance in tomato which can be further transferred to other economically important crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency enhanced the adaptive response to four days of drought relative to adequate N.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e0
Outcome
plant adaptive response to drought stresse0
Direction
enhancese0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency yielded higher aboveground biomass under drought.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e1
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency yielded longer roots under drought.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e1
Outcome
roote0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency increased specific leaf weight under drought.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e1
Outcome
specific leaf weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency enhanced stomatal conductance without reducing water content under drought.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
without reducing water contente0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior mild N deficiency increased leaf sugar content under drought.

Treatment
mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − )e1
Outcome
leaf sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher aboveground biomass, longer root, increased specific leaf weight, enhanced stomatal conductance (without reducing water content), and higher leaf sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“a former mild N‐deficiency (2 mM NO 3 − ) enhances plant adaptive response to drought stress (4 days) when compared to the plants treated with adequate N (5 mM NO 3 − ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APX1 expression was higher under N deficiency alone and with drought after recovery.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
N‐deficiency and in combination with droughte0
Gene
APX1e0
Outcome
expression levele0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the APX1 gene showed a higher expression level compared to control under N‐deficiency and in combination with drought in the leaf, after a one‐week recovery period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1807 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–123 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Nitrogen, potassium and iron starvation did not induce transporter expression.

    Tomato Phosphate Transporter Genes Are Differentially Regulated in Plant Tissues by Phosphorus1 · 1998 · compared with Pi starvation

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 27 positive, 13 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 108 positive, 45 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.