Paper · 1997 · Photosynthetica

Effect of fruiting and drought or flooding on carbon balance of apple trees

M.L. Wibbe; M.M. Blanke

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of fruiting or deblossomed trees to water stress such as drought or flooding was investigated in six semi open-top cuvettes each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree. Xylem water potentials of leaves dropped from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d of drought, the effect being enhanced by fruiting. Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees. Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE). This reduction in WUE was greater in the non-fruiting trees. Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting; aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees. Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE), suggesting different adaptation mechanisms for the two forms of water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered leaf xylem water potential of apple trees from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d, an effect enhanced by fruiting.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Material
Golden Deliciouse1
Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
Xylem water potentiale2
Direction
droppede2
Value
-1.2 to -4.1 MPae2
Qualifier
within 7 de2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Xylem water potentials of leaves dropped from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d of drought, the effect being enhanced by fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple trees without fruits had smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate and dark respiration rate after 2 d of drought than fruiting trees.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticae3
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D )e3
Direction
smaller reductionse3
Comparator
fruiting treese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 2 d of drought, non-fruiting apple trees had a more positive carbon balance than fruiting trees.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticae3
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
carbon balancee3
Direction
more positivee3
Comparator
fruiting treese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on net photosynthetic rate than on transpiration, reducing water use efficiency.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Flooding for 4 de4
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–213 · show in text ↑
e4

“Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced net photosynthetic rate of whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting.

Treatment
Floodinge5
Outcome
P N of the whole apple canopiese5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under flooding, non-fruiting apple trees increased dark respiration rate relative to fruiting trees.

Treatment
Floodinge5
Outcome
R De6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
fruiting treese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–810 · show in text ↑
e6

“aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under flooding, non-fruiting apple trees had a less positive carbon balance than fruiting trees.

Treatment
Floodinge5
Outcome
carbon balancee6
Direction
less positivee6
Comparator
fruiting treese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–810 · show in text ↑
e6

“aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in water use efficiency under flooding was greater in non-fruiting apple trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Flooding for 4 de4
Outcome
reduction in WUEe2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
non-fruiting treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–213 · show in text ↑
e4

“Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–674 · show in text ↑
e2

“This reduction in WUE was greater in the non-fruiting trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–735 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruiting increased the sensitivity of apple trees to drought (dark respiration rate and net photosynthetic rate).

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Fruitinge1
Outcome
sensitivity to droughte1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1058 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruiting decreased the sensitivity of apple trees to flooding (dark respiration rate and water use efficiency).

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Fruitinge1
Outcome
sensitivity to floodinge1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1058 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

21 papers: 4 positive, 17 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.