Abstract
The response of fruiting or deblossomed trees to water stress such as drought or flooding was investigated in six semi open-top cuvettes each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree. Xylem water potentials of leaves dropped from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d of drought, the effect being enhanced by fruiting. Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees. Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE). This reduction in WUE was greater in the non-fruiting trees. Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting; aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees. Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE), suggesting different adaptation mechanisms for the two forms of water stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Drought lowered leaf xylem water potential of apple trees from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d, an effect enhanced by fruiting.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica
Malus domesticae1 - Material
- Golden Deliciouse1
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- Xylem water potentiale2
- Direction
- droppede2
- Value
- -1.2 to -4.1 MPae2
- Qualifier
- within 7 de2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”
e2“Xylem water potentials of leaves dropped from -1.2 to -4.1 MPa within 7 d of drought, the effect being enhanced by fruiting”
Claim · model-written summary
Apple trees without fruits had smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate and dark respiration rate after 2 d of drought than fruiting trees.
- Taxon
- Apple trees
Malus domesticae3 - Treatment
- droughte3
- Outcome
- net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D )e3
- Direction
- smaller reductionse3
- Comparator
- fruiting treese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees”
Claim · model-written summary
After 2 d of drought, non-fruiting apple trees had a more positive carbon balance than fruiting trees.
- Taxon
- Apple trees
Malus domesticae3 - Treatment
- droughte3
- Outcome
- carbon balancee3
- Direction
- more positivee3
- Comparator
- fruiting treese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Apple trees without fruits showed smaller reductions in net photosynthetic rate (P N ) and dark respiration rate (R D ) after 2 d of drought and hence more positive carbon balances relative to fruiting trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on net photosynthetic rate than on transpiration, reducing water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Flooding for 4 de4
- Outcome
- water use efficiency (WUE)e4
- Direction
- reducede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”
e4“Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding reduced net photosynthetic rate of whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae5 - Treatment
- Floodinge5
- Outcome
- P N of the whole apple canopiese5
- Direction
- reducede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”
Claim · model-written summary
Under flooding, non-fruiting apple trees increased dark respiration rate relative to fruiting trees.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae5 - Treatment
- Floodinge5
- Outcome
- R De6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Comparator
- fruiting treese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”
e6“aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Under flooding, non-fruiting apple trees had a less positive carbon balance than fruiting trees.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae5 - Treatment
- Floodinge5
- Outcome
- carbon balancee6
- Direction
- less positivee6
- Comparator
- fruiting treese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Flooding reduced P N of the whole apple canopies irrespective of fruiting”
e6“aple trees without fruits increased R D resulting in a less positive carbon balance relative to fruiting trees”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduction in water use efficiency under flooding was greater in non-fruiting apple trees.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Flooding for 4 de4
- Outcome
- reduction in WUEe2
- Direction
- greatere2
- Comparator
- non-fruiting treese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“each containing one apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Golden Delicious) tree”
e4“Flooding for 4 d had a more pronounced effect on P N than on transpiration, resulting in a reduced water use efficiency (WUE)”
e2“This reduction in WUE was greater in the non-fruiting trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruiting increased the sensitivity of apple trees to drought (dark respiration rate and net photosynthetic rate).
- Taxon
- apple trees
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Fruitinge1
- Outcome
- sensitivity to droughte1
- Direction
- increasede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruiting decreased the sensitivity of apple trees to flooding (dark respiration rate and water use efficiency).
- Taxon
- apple trees
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Fruitinge1
- Outcome
- sensitivity to floodinge1
- Direction
- decreasede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Fruiting increased the sensitivity to drought of apple trees (R D and P N ), but decreased their sensitivity to flooding (R D and WUE)”
The same questions in other papers
drought · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →flooding · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
flooding · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
drought · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.