Paper · 2002 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Investigations of Aroma Volatile Biosynthesis under Anoxic Conditions and in Different Tissues of “Redchief Delicious” Apple Fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.)

D. R. Rudell; D. S. Mattinson; J. P. Mattheis; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Disks from different tissues were obtained from "Redchief Delicious" apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) and analyzed for the ability to metabolize 1-pentanol as well as synthesize constitutive esters and alcohols under anoxic and aerobic conditions. The skin tissue displayed a greater capacity to synthesize pentanal, pentyl acetate, pentyl propionate, pentyl butyrate, and pentyl hexanoate than the hypanthial and carpellary tissues during incubation with 1-pentanol. With the exception of pentyl acetate and pentyl propionate biosynthesis, the hypanthial tissue synthesized these compounds at a higher rate than the carpellary tissue. Anoxia inhibited both constituent and 1-pentanol-derived ester biosynthesis. While anoxia inhibited ester biosynthesis, ethanol biosynthesis increased at a greater rate in tissue disks held under these conditions. Biosynthesis of 1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and 1-hexanol was greater in tissue disks held in air during the first part of the measurement period and dropped off more rapidly than those transpiring in tissue disks held under anoxic conditions. The biosynthetic rates of all esters, both constituent and 1-pentanol-derived, increased as a result of air exposure. While hypoxic or anoxic conditions may promote ethanol synthesis, these conditions also appear to inhibit the formation of the ethanol-derived esters partially responsible for the off-flavor in apples attributed to ultralow O(2) controlled atmosphere storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple skin synthesized five volatiles more than hypanthial and carpellary tissues with 1-pentanol.

Organ / stage
skin tissuee0
Treatment
1-pentanole0
Outcome
pentanal, pentyl acetate, pentyl propionate, pentyl butyrate, and pentyl hexanoatee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
hypanthial and carpellary tissuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The skin tissue displayed a greater capacity to synthesize pentanal, pentyl acetate, pentyl propionate, pentyl butyrate, and pentyl hexanoate than the hypanthial and carpellary tissues during incubation with 1-pentanol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypanthial tissue synthesized these volatiles faster than carpellary tissue, except two pentyl esters.

Organ / stage
hypanthial tissuee0
Outcome
these compoundse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
exception of pentyl acetate and pentyl propionate biosynthesise0
Comparator
carpellary tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of pentyl acetate and pentyl propionate biosynthesis, the hypanthial tissue synthesized these compounds at a higher rate than the carpellary tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anoxia inhibited constitutive ester biosynthesis.

Treatment
Anoxiae0
Outcome
constituente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anoxia inhibited both constituent and 1-pentanol-derived ester biosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anoxia inhibited 1-pentanol-derived ester biosynthesis.

Treatment
Anoxiae0
Outcome
1-pentanol-derived ester biosynthesise0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anoxia inhibited both constituent and 1-pentanol-derived ester biosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under anoxia, ethanol biosynthesis increased at a greater rate.

Treatment
anoxiae0
Outcome
ethanol biosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While anoxia inhibited ester biosynthesis, ethanol biosynthesis increased at a greater rate in tissue disks held under these conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early biosynthesis of three alcohols was greater in air and declined more rapidly.

Treatment
aire0
Outcome
Biosynthesis of 1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and 1-hexanole0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
anoxic conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biosynthesis of 1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and 1-hexanol was greater in tissue disks held in air during the first part of the measurement period and dropped off more rapidly than those transpiring in tissue disks held under anoxic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air exposure increased biosynthetic rates of all esters.

Treatment
air exposuree0
Outcome
biosynthetic rates of all esterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biosynthetic rates of all esters, both constituent and 1-pentanol-derived, increased as a result of air exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 · show in text ↑

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.