Paper · 2001 · PubMed

[Relationship between soil water content and water use efficiency of apple leaves].

Y Jie; H Yang; M Cui; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The relationship between soil water content and water use efficiency (WUE) of apple tree leaf was examined, and the mechanism of WUE variation was also studied by using pot-culture. The results showed that the WUE was upmost when soil water relative content (SWC) reached 52.0%. The increase of WUE when SWC decreased from 77.2% to 52.0% was mainly caused by the change of stomatal conductance. The decline of carboxylation efficiency resulted in the decrease of WUE when SWC decreased from 52.0% to 20.1%. The WUE returned up after being rewatered, but could not reach the control level within a week. The WUE decreased when the soil was waterlogged, but reached the control level in three days after being waterlogged. After the third day, the WUE decreased gradually with the extending of the time being waterlogged. On the sixth day being waterlogged, the carboxylation efficiency decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaf WUE was highest at 52.0% soil water relative content.

Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
upmoste0
Value
52.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the WUE was upmost when soil water relative content (SWC) reached 52.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced stomatal conductance mainly explained the WUE increase as SWC fell from 77.2% to 52.0%.

Outcome
increase of WUEe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
change of stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of WUE when SWC decreased from 77.2% to 52.0% was mainly caused by the change of stomatal conductance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Declining carboxylation efficiency explained lower WUE as SWC fell from 52.0% to 20.1%.

Outcome
decrease of WUEe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
decline of carboxylation efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decline of carboxylation efficiency resulted in the decrease of WUE when SWC decreased from 52.0% to 20.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE rose after rewatering but remained below control within a week.

Treatment
rewaterede0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
returned upe0
Qualifier
within a weeke0
Comparator
control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE returned up after being rewatered, but could not reach the control level within a week.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging lowered WUE.

Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE decreased when the soil was waterlogged, but reached the control level in three days after being waterlogged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE reached control level three days after waterlogging.

Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
WUEe0
Qualifier
three dayse0
Comparator
control levele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE decreased when the soil was waterlogged, but reached the control level in three days after being waterlogged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE gradually declined after day three as waterlogging continued.

Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
decreased graduallye0
Qualifier
After the third daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the third day, the WUE decreased gradually with the extending of the time being waterlogged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxylation efficiency fell on the sixth day of waterlogging.

Outcome
carboxylation efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
sixth daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the sixth day being waterlogged, the carboxylation efficiency decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑

rewatering · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.