Paper · 2013 · Progress in Plant Protection

The problem of secondary weed infestation in integrated production of corn

H Golebiowska; Marek Skorupa

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is assumed that in a good integrated corn production that includes proper crop rotation and agricultural techniques based on plow cultivation and high nutrient requirements, grain yielding can be affected by the number of weeds not completely destroyed or left on the field as a result of not appropriate herbicide selection and treatment time that can lead into secondary weed infestation. Weed species with the largest share of the secondary weed infestation in corn are: common lambquarters (Chenopodium album L.) barnyard grass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beav.], yellow foxtail [Setaria glauca (L.) P. Beav.] and green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beav.]. The aim of the study was an evolution of possibilities of regulation of the secondary weed infestation in integrated maize production with two herbicide variants used preemergence and postemergence. The weather conditions especially in 2011 year affected efficacy of acetochlor that was applied as preemergence application to weeds at more advanced stages of development. The treatment was ineffective and increased plant abundance in secondary weed infestation, i.e. at the level of 27%. Weed control with a mixture of nicosulfuron + mesotrione with adjuvant Atpolan Bio 88 EC system divided doses applied as postemergence application showed better herbicidal activity and high secondary weed infestation in 2011 did not exceed 3% of the soil cover. Higher and cleaner yields with robust grain were obtained from the herbicide mixture treatment compared to the object treated with acetochlor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambquarters, barnyard grass, yellow foxtail and green foxtail had the largest share of secondary weed infestation in corn.

Interactor
common lambquarterse0weed
Outcome
largest share of the secondary weed infestatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed species with the largest share of the secondary weed infestation in corn are: common lambquarters (Chenopodium album L.) barnyard grass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beav.], yellow foxtail [Setaria glauca (L.) P. Beav.] and green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beav.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence acetochlor was ineffective against advanced weeds in 2011 and secondary weed abundance reached 27%.

Treatment
acetochlore1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
plant abundance in secondary weed infestatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment was ineffective and increased plant abundance in secondary weed infestation, i.e. at the level of 27%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The weather conditions especially in 2011 year affected efficacy of acetochlor that was applied as preemergence application to weeds at more advanced stages of development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence nicosulfuron and mesotrione with adjuvant kept 2011 secondary weed infestation at no more than 3% soil cover.

Treatment
mixture of nicosulfuron + mesotrione with adjuvant Atpolan Bio 88 ECe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
secondary weed infestatione0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control with a mixture of nicosulfuron + mesotrione with adjuvant Atpolan Bio 88 EC system divided doses applied as postemergence application showed better herbicidal activity and high secondary weed infestation in 2011 did not exceed 3% of the soil cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture gave higher, cleaner corn yields with robust grain than acetochlor.

Treatment
herbicide mixture treatmente0
Outcome
yields with robust graine0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
acetochlore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher and cleaner yields with robust grain were obtained from the herbicide mixture treatment compared to the object treated with acetochlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1564 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑

acetochlor · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

adjuvant · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nicosulfuron · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

mesotrione · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.