Paper · 1997 · Weed Technology

Effect of Timing and Adjuvants on the Efficacy of Reduced Herbicide Rates for Sweet Corn (Zea mays)

John O'Sullivan; William J. Bouw

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of reduced rates of metolachlor plus cyanazine for weed control in sweet corn was evaluated over a 2-yr period. Early postemergence (POST) and POST herbicide applications at reduced rates gave control of broadleaf weeds comparable to control at the 1 × rate, except for the early POST application at the ¼ × rate in 1993. Preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications at reduced rates gave poor broadleaf weed control, except for the PRE application at the ½ × rate in 1993. Early POST applications at the ¼ × rate resulted in significantly reduced grass control in 1994, while POST applications at the ¼ × rate gave significantly reduced grass control both years. Generally, POST applications controlled broadleaf weeds better than early POST applications, while grass control with early POST applications was superior to POST applications at reduced rates. Preemergence and PPI applications at reduced rates gave poor broadleaf weed control but satisfactory grass control. Preplant incorporated applications at reduced rates resulted in reduced yield both years, while PRE applications at reduced rates reduced yield only in 1994. Early POST and POST applications at reduced rates did not affect sweet corn yield. The addition of adjuvants to the ¼ × application rate had no effect on weed control or yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced early POST and POST rates gave broadleaf control comparable to the full rate, except early POST quarter rate in 1993.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Early postemergence (POST) and POST herbicide applications at reduced ratese0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
control of broadleaf weedse0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
except for the early POST application at the ¼ × rate in 1993e0
Comparator
1 × ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“Early postemergence (POST) and POST herbicide applications at reduced rates gave control of broadleaf weeds comparable to control at the 1 × rate, except for the early POST application at the ¼ × rate in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PPI and PRE rates generally gave poor broadleaf control, except PRE half rate in 1993.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications at reduced ratese0
Interactor
broadleaf weede0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications at reduced rates gave poor broadleaf weed control, except for the PRE application at the ½ × rate in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early POST quarter rate significantly reduced grass control in 1994.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Early POST applications at the ¼ × ratee0
Interactor
grasse0weed
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Early POST applications at the ¼ × rate resulted in significantly reduced grass control in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

POST quarter rate significantly reduced grass control in both years.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
POST applications at the ¼ × ratee0
Interactor
grasse0weed
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“POST applications at the ¼ × rate gave significantly reduced grass control both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST applications controlled broadleaf weeds better than early POST applications.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
POST applicationse0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled broadleaf weedse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
early POST applicationse0

Verbatim

e0

“POST applications controlled broadleaf weeds better than early POST applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early POST applications controlled grasses better than POST at reduced rates.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
early POST applicationse0
Interactor
grasse0weed
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
POST applications at reduced ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“grass control with early POST applications was superior to POST applications at reduced rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PRE and PPI rates provided satisfactory grass control.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Preemergence and PPI applications at reduced ratese0
Interactor
grasse0weed
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preemergence and PPI applications at reduced rates gave poor broadleaf weed control but satisfactory grass control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PPI rates reduced sweet corn yield in both years.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Preplant incorporated applications at reduced ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant incorporated applications at reduced rates resulted in reduced yield both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PRE rates reduced sweet corn yield only in 1994.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
PRE applications at reduced ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PRE applications at reduced rates reduced yield only in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced early POST and POST rates did not affect sweet corn yield.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Early POST and POST applications at reduced ratese0
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Early POST and POST applications at reduced rates did not affect sweet corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding adjuvants at quarter rate did not affect weed control or yield.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
addition of adjuvants to the ¼ × application ratee0
Outcome
weed control or yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of adjuvants to the ¼ × application rate had no effect on weed control or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–99 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.