Paper · 2013 · Progress in Plant Protection

Effect of fertilization, chemical crop protection and sowing density on health status of winter wheat grown in short-time monoculture on light soil

Grzegorz Lemańczyk; M. Piekarczyk

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field research was performed in the years 2004–2007, at the Mochelek Experimental Station (53°13' N, 17°51' E) near Bydgoszcz on good rye complex. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of chemical control (without protection, herbicide, herbicide + fungicide), the mineral fertilisation (147 and 221 kg/ha NPK) and the sowing density (400 and 600 grains/m) on the occurrence of diseases in winter wheat cv. Tonacja, grown in short-term monoculture. A tendency of an increase in the symptoms severity of tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) intensity and decrease of leaf blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) occurrence was noted in the successive wheat growing years in a short-term monoculture. A significant effect of the studied factors was registered and disease severity was dependent on the pesticide treatments. The fewest disease symptoms were recorded after fungicide (flusilazole + carbendazim) and herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) application. The herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) application resulted in increase of disease occurrence, especially leaf blotch and glume blotch (Phaeosphaeria nodorum). Much more symptoms of leaf blotch and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) were observed at a higher sowing density. Fewer symptoms of diseases were observed at a lower NPK rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tan spot symptoms tended to increase over successive wheat monoculture years.

Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms severity of tan spote0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
short-term monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A tendency of an increase in the symptoms severity of tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) intensity and decrease of leaf blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) occurrence was noted in the successive wheat growing years in a short-term monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–710 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf blotch occurrence tended to decrease over successive wheat monoculture years.

Interactor
Mycosphaerella graminicolaZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
leaf blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) occurrencee0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
short-term monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A tendency of an increase in the symptoms severity of tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) intensity and decrease of leaf blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) occurrence was noted in the successive wheat growing years in a short-term monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide and herbicide together produced the fewest disease symptoms.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide (flusilazole + carbendazim) and herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) applicatione0
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
feweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fewest disease symptoms were recorded after fungicide (flusilazole + carbendazim) and herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application increased disease occurrence, especially leaf blotch and glume blotch.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) applicatione0
Interactor
Phaeosphaeria nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
disease occurrence, especially leaf blotch and glume blotche0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide (iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium) application resulted in increase of disease occurrence, especially leaf blotch and glume blotch (Phaeosphaeria nodorum).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sowing density increased leaf blotch and powdery mildew symptoms.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher sowing densitye0
Interactor
Blumeria graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms of leaf blotch and powdery mildewe0
Direction
Much moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Much more symptoms of leaf blotch and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) were observed at a higher sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower NPK rate was associated with fewer disease symptoms.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
lower NPK ratee0
Outcome
symptoms of diseasese0
Direction
Fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer symptoms of diseases were observed at a lower NPK rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑

flusilazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

herbicide · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.