Paper · 2013 · Soil Use and Management

Soil and weed management for enhancing arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization of wheat

I. Brito; M. Carvalho; M. J. Goss

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Tillage and weed control are critical components of cropping systems that need to be combined such that crops benefit from reduced competition. However, weeds may also contribute to the biological diversity within the agro‐environment. This greenhouse study investigated whether common weeds of arable cropping systems were suitable host plants for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ( AMF ), allowing the development of extraradical mycelium ( ERM ) that can contribute to the early colonization of a following wheat crop, especially in the absence of soil disturbance. Weeds were allowed to grow for up to 2 months before being controlled by soil disturbance or herbicide application (glyphosate or paraquat). Pregerminated wheat seeds were then planted. Chemical control of the weeds prior to sowing enhanced the early arbuscular mycorrhiza ( AM ) colonization rate of wheat roots, whereas mechanical disturbance was less acceptable as a method of weed control for rapid AM colonization. The type of herbicide (contact or systemic) had no impact on colonization of the wheat crop. Enhanced AM colonization promoted early P acquisition and growth of the crop. Appropriate management of weeds emerging between two consecutive cropping seasons coupled with no‐till soil management could ensure a quick and efficient AM colonization of the following wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control enhanced early AM colonization of wheat roots.

Treatment
Chemical control of the weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
colonization rate of wheat rootse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical control of the weeds prior to sowing enhanced the early arbuscular mycorrhiza ( AM ) colonization rate of wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical disturbance was less suitable for rapid AM colonization.

Outcome
less acceptable as a method of weed control for rapid AM colonizatione0
Direction
less acceptablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanical disturbance was less acceptable as a method of weed control for rapid AM colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contact versus systemic herbicide type did not affect wheat colonization.

Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
colonization of the wheat crope0
Direction
no impacte0
Comparator
contact or systemice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The type of herbicide (contact or systemic) had no impact on colonization of the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1085 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced AM colonization promoted early phosphorus acquisition.

Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
early P acquisitione0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced AM colonization promoted early P acquisition and growth of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced AM colonization promoted crop growth.

Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
growth of the crope0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced AM colonization promoted early P acquisition and growth of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that weed management with no-till can secure rapid AM colonization in the following wheat crop.

Treatment
no‐till soil managemente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
quick and efficient AM colonizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Appropriate management of weeds emerging between two consecutive cropping seasons coupled with no‐till soil management could ensure a quick and efficient AM colonization of the following wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1364 · show in text ↑

herbicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.