Paper · 2015 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Minimal evidence for consistent changes in maize DNA methylation patterns following environmental stress

Steven R. Eichten; Nathan M. Springer

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
94
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

DNA methylation is a chromatin modification that is sometimes associated with epigenetic regulation of gene expression. As DNA methylation can be reversible at some loci, it is possible that methylation patterns may change within an organism that is subjected to environmental stress. In order to assess the effects of abiotic stress on DNA methylation patterns in maize (Zea mays), seeding plants were subjected to heat, cold, and UV stress treatments. Tissue was later collected from individual adult plants that had been subjected to stress or control treatments and used to perform DNA methylation profiling to determine whether there were consistent changes in DNA methylation triggered by specific stress treatments. DNA methylation profiling was performed by immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA followed by microarray hybridization to allow for quantitative estimates of DNA methylation abundance throughout the low-copy portion of the maize genome. By comparing the DNA methylation profiles of each individual plant to the average of the control plants it was possible to identify regions of the genome with variable DNA methylation. However, we did not find evidence of consistent DNA methylation changes resulting from the stress treatments used in this study. Instead, the data suggest that there is a low-rate of stochastic variation that is present in both control and stressed plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat, cold and UV stress did not cause consistent DNA methylation changes in maize relative to controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
heat, cold, and UV stress treatmentse4
Outcome
consistent DNA methylation changese1
Direction
did not find evidence of consistente1
Comparator
the average of the control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to assess the effects of abiotic stress on DNA methylation patterns in maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
e4

“seeding plants were subjected to heat, cold, and UV stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–452 · show in text ↑
e1

“we did not find evidence of consistent DNA methylation changes resulting from the stress treatments used in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1271 · show in text ↑
e2

“By comparing the DNA methylation profiles of each individual plant to the average of the control plants it was possible to identify regions of the genome with variable DNA methylation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A low rate of stochastic DNA methylation variation is present in both control and stressed maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
low-rate of stochastic variatione3
Qualifier
present in both control and stressed plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to assess the effects of abiotic stress on DNA methylation patterns in maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
e3

“the data suggest that there is a low-rate of stochastic variation that is present in both control and stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1399 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comparing each plant with the average of control plants identified regions of the maize genome with variable DNA methylation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
regions of the genome with variable DNA methylatione2
Comparator
the average of the control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to assess the effects of abiotic stress on DNA methylation patterns in maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
e2

“By comparing the DNA methylation profiles of each individual plant to the average of the control plants it was possible to identify regions of the genome with variable DNA methylation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1142 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

heat · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

cold · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 21 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.