Paper · 2009 · Mianhua xuebao

Allelopathy and Chemical Constituents of Decomposing Products from Cotton Stalk

Zhang Li-li

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton stalks were inoculated with some rhizospheric soil and decomposed under the temperature of 35 ℃.After decomposing 60 hours,the decomposing products were extracted by mixture of acetone and ethyl acetate in 5 days.The extract was concentrated and then subjected to bio-assay and chemical constituents analysis by GC-MS technique.The results indicated that cotton stalk decomposing products showed allelopathy on seed germination and seedling growth.It was observed that under concentration of 0.5 g·L-1,1.0 g·L-1,1.5 g·L-1 extract,the seed germination was constrained under higher concentration but promoted under lower concentration.The cotton stalk decomposing products showed significant inhibition on seedling growth(P 0.01)even under the concentration of 0.5 g·L-1.And weakened root vigor,reduced chlorophyll contents and declined fresh weight and plant height were found when the extract added into hydroponic culture.A lethal effect on tested cotton seedling was observed when the concentration of extract in nutrition solution reached to 1.5 g·L-1.Activities of SOD and POD were induced at lower concentration but inhibited by higher concentrations of the extract.Higher contents of MDA were also found in higher concentration extract treatments.Total of 24 main constituents were detected in cotton stalk decomposing products by GC-MS analysis,the predominant constituents including 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone(27.31%),dibutyl phthalate(7.87%),hexadecanoic acid(6.69%),butanedioic acid,methyl-,bis(1-methylpropyl)ester(6.40%),9,12-octadecadienoic acid(Z,Z)-(5.43%),etc.Several of them have been identified as allelochemicals which were frequently reported.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High extract concentration constrained cotton seed germination.

Treatment
higher concentratione0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
constrainede0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed germination was constrained under higher concentration but promoted under lower concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low extract concentration promoted cotton seed germination.

Treatment
lower concentratione0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
higher concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed germination was constrained under higher concentration but promoted under lower concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract significantly inhibited seedling growth even at 0.5 g·L-1.

Treatment
cotton stalk decomposing productse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
0.5 g·L-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton stalk decomposing products showed significant inhibition on seedling growth(P 0.01)even under the concentration of 0.5 g·L-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract in hydroponic culture weakened cotton root vigor.

Treatment
extract added into hydroponic culturee0
Outcome
root vigore0
Direction
weakenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weakened root vigor,reduced chlorophyll contents and declined fresh weight and plant height were found when the extract added into hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract in hydroponic culture reduced cotton chlorophyll content.

Treatment
extract added into hydroponic culturee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weakened root vigor,reduced chlorophyll contents and declined fresh weight and plant height were found when the extract added into hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract in hydroponic culture decreased cotton fresh weight and height.

Treatment
extract added into hydroponic culturee0
Outcome
fresh weight and plant heighte0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weakened root vigor,reduced chlorophyll contents and declined fresh weight and plant height were found when the extract added into hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract at 1.5 g·L-1 in nutrient solution was lethal to tested cotton seedlings.

Treatment
extract in nutrition solutione0
Outcome
lethal effect on tested cotton seedlinge0
Value
1.5 g·L-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lethal effect on tested cotton seedling was observed when the concentration of extract in nutrition solution reached to 1.5 g·L-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low extract concentration induced SOD and POD activity.

Treatment
lower concentratione0
Outcome
Activities of SOD and PODe0
Direction
inducede0
Comparator
higher concentrations of the extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of SOD and POD were induced at lower concentration but inhibited by higher concentrations of the extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High extract concentration inhibited SOD and POD activity.

Treatment
higher concentrations of the extracte0
Outcome
Activities of SOD and PODe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of SOD and POD were induced at lower concentration but inhibited by higher concentrations of the extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High extract concentration increased MDA content.

Treatment
higher concentration extract treatmentse0
Outcome
contents of MDAe0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher contents of MDA were also found in higher concentration extract treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GC-MS detected 24 main constituents in cotton stalk decomposition products.

Outcome
main constituentse0
Value
24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total of 24 main constituents were detected in cotton stalk decomposing products by GC-MS analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone was a predominant constituent at 27.31%.

Outcome
4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanonee0
Value
27.31%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone(27.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dibutyl phthalate was a predominant constituent at 7.87%.

Outcome
dibutyl phthalatee0
Value
7.87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dibutyl phthalate(7.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexadecanoic acid was a predominant constituent at 6.69%.

Outcome
hexadecanoic acide0
Value
6.69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hexadecanoic acid(6.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butanedioic acid,methyl-,bis(1-methylpropyl)ester was a predominant constituent at 6.40%.

Outcome
butanedioic acid,methyl-,bis(1-methylpropyl)estere0
Value
6.40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“butanedioic acid,methyl-,bis(1-methylpropyl)ester(6.40%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

9,12-octadecadienoic acid(Z,Z)- was a predominant constituent at 5.43%.

Outcome
9,12-octadecadienoic acid(Z,Z)-e0
Value
5.43%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9,12-octadecadienoic acid(Z,Z)-(5.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

botanical · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 21 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.