Abstract
The field experiments and systematic investigation were made to study the effects of intercropping of cabbage and garlic on major pests and arthropod community in spring cabbage fields.The results showed that the intercropping of cabbage and garlic was able to reduce the degree of occurrence of major pests,Pieris rapae and Lipaphis erqsimi,raise the diversity and the ratio of natural enemies to pests of arthropod community,and was helpful to improve the community stability and reinforce the control of natural enemies on pests in spring cabbage fields.The average population density of major pests,Pieris rapae and Lipaphis erqsimi was reduced by 48.9% and 35.6% respectively,and the average diversity index and the ratio of natural enemies to pests of arthropod community rised by 17.9% and 61.8% respectively in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field.Therefore,the intercropping of cabbage and garlic was helpful to reduce the pressure of cabbage pests caused by other control methods,including using insecticides,and improve the effects of provention and treatment and comprehensive benefit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic reduced the population density of Pieris rapae by 48.9% compared with cabbage monoculture.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae1 - Treatment
- intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlice1
- Interactor
- Pieris rapae
Pieris rapaee0pest - Outcome
- population density of major pests,Pieris rapaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 48.9%e0
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde1
- Setting
- field experimentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average population density of major pests,Pieris rapae and Lipaphis erqsimi was reduced by 48.9% and 35.6% respectively”
e1“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
e2“The field experiments and systematic investigation were made”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic reduced the population density of Lipaphis erqsimi by 35.6% compared with cabbage monoculture.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlice1
- Interactor
- Lipaphis erqsimie0pest
- Outcome
- population density of major pests,Pieris rapae and Lipaphis erqsimie0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 35.6%e0
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde1
- Setting
- field experimentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average population density of major pests,Pieris rapae and Lipaphis erqsimi was reduced by 48.9% and 35.6% respectively”
e1“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
e2“The field experiments and systematic investigation were made”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic raised the average diversity index of the arthropod community by 17.9% compared with cabbage monoculture.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlice1
- Outcome
- average diversity indexe0
- Direction
- risede0
- Value
- 17.9%e0
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde1
- Setting
- field experimentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the average diversity index and the ratio of natural enemies to pests of arthropod community rised by 17.9% and 61.8% respectively”
e1“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
e2“The field experiments and systematic investigation were made”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic raised the ratio of natural enemies to pests by 61.8% compared with cabbage monoculture.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlice1
- Outcome
- ratio of natural enemies to pestse0
- Direction
- risede0
- Value
- 61.8%e0
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde1
- Setting
- field experimentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the average diversity index and the ratio of natural enemies to pests of arthropod community rised by 17.9% and 61.8% respectively”
e1“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
e2“The field experiments and systematic investigation were made”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic was helpful to improve arthropod community stability in spring cabbage fields.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae2
- Treatment
- intercropping of cabbage and garlice0
- Outcome
- community stabilitye1
- Direction
- improvee1
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of intercropping of cabbage and garlic on major pests and arthropod community in spring cabbage fields”
e1“was helpful to improve the community stability and reinforce the control of natural enemies on pests in spring cabbage fields”
e2“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cabbage with garlic was helpful to reinforce the control of natural enemies on cabbage pests.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae2
- Treatment
- intercropping of cabbage and garlice0
- Outcome
- control of natural enemies on pestse1
- Direction
- reinforcee1
- Comparator
- cabbage monoculture fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of intercropping of cabbage and garlic on major pests and arthropod community in spring cabbage fields”
e1“was helpful to improve the community stability and reinforce the control of natural enemies on pests in spring cabbage fields”
e2“in intercropping field of 1 line cabbage and 1 line garlic as compared with those in cabbage monoculture field”
The same questions in other papers
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · Pieris rapae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Allium sativum · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Brassica oleracea var. capitata · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Allium sativum · Pieris rapae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · Pieris rapae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
intercropping · ecology: diversity · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.