Paper · 1988 · Journal of Applied Entomology

Influence of host plant on the development and annual generations of the cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni (Hb.) in Egypt

M. A. Ali; A. L. Abdel‐Salam; A. I. Gadallah; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The influence of four cruciferous host plants viz: Cabbage, cauliflower, turnip and radish on rate of development, mortality, weight of immatures, fecundity and number of annual generations of Trichoplusia ni was experimentally investigated. Host plants exerted no effect on the number of annual generations. Cabbage was the most favourable host plant. Larval development was accelerated when fed on cabbage leaves and somewhat retarded on radish. Larval diet also had enormous effect on pupal duration, generation period and adult longevity. Females fed as larvae on cabbage laid the highest number of fertile eggs. Weights of the different stages were the heaviest when their larvae were fed on cabbage or cauliflower leaves. Zusammenfassung Über den Einfluß der Wirtspflanzenart auf die Entwicklung und Genemtionszahl der Kohleule, Trichoplusia ni (Hb.) in Ägypten Es wurde der Einfluß von 4 Wirtspflanzenarten aus der Familie Cruciferae (Weißkohl, Blumenkohl, Rettich und Radieschen) auf Entwicklungsrate, Sterblichkeit, Larven‐ und Puppengewicht, Fekundität sowie Zahl jährlicher Generationen von Trichoplusia ni untersucht. Die Wirtspflanze zeigte keinen Einfluß auf die Generationszahl. Bevorzugte Pflanzenart war der Weißkohl. Die Raupenentwicklung wurde bei Fraß an Weißkohl beschleunigt, bei Fraß an Radieschen etwas verlangsamt. Die Raupennahrung zeigte starke Auswirkungen auf die Puppendauer, Generationsperiode und Falter‐Lebensdauer. Weibliche Falter, hervorgegangen aus Raupen, die an Weißkohl fraßen, legten die höchste Zahl befruchteter Eier ab. Die Gewichte der verschiedenen Stadien waren nach Fraß der Raupen an Weißkohl oder Blumenkohl am höchsten.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Host plant did not change cabbage looper annual generation number.

Treatment
Host plantse0
Outcome
number of annual generationse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Host plants exerted no effect on the number of annual generations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage looper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage was the most favorable host plant for cabbage looper.

Outcome
most favourable host plante0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cabbage was the most favourable host plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage leaves accelerated larval development.

Treatment
fed on cabbage leavese0
Outcome
Larval developmente0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
radishe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larval development was accelerated when fed on cabbage leaves and somewhat retarded on radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish retarded larval development.

Treatment
radishe0
Outcome
Larval developmente0
Direction
retardede0
Comparator
cabbage leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larval development was accelerated when fed on cabbage leaves and somewhat retarded on radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–456 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval diet affected pupal duration, generation period and adult longevity.

Treatment
Larval diete0
Outcome
pupal duration, generation period and adult longevitye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Larval diet also had enormous effect on pupal duration, generation period and adult longevity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage looper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Females reared on cabbage laid the most fertile eggs.

Treatment
fed as larvae on cabbagee0
Outcome
number of fertile eggse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Females fed as larvae on cabbage laid the highest number of fertile eggs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage fed larvae yielded the heaviest immature stages.

Treatment
fed on cabbagee0
Outcome
Weights of the different stagese0
Direction
heavieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weights of the different stages were the heaviest when their larvae were fed on cabbage or cauliflower leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower fed larvae yielded the heaviest immature stages.

Treatment
cauliflower leavese0
Outcome
Weights of the different stagese0
Direction
heavieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weights of the different stages were the heaviest when their larvae were fed on cabbage or cauliflower leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–736 · show in text ↑

Brassica oleracea var. capitata · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Brassica oleracea var. capitata · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.