Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental Sciences

TOMATO AS AN INTERCROPPED PLANT ON THE PESTS AND NATURAL ENEMIES OFTHE PESTS OF CABBAGE (BRASSICA OLERACEA)

Moses Br; ford Mochiah; Philip Kweku Baidoo; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The excessive and continuous use of synthetic chemicals for cabbage production has received several concerns over chemical residues in food and their resultant effects on the health of humans and animals. It is against this background that an effective and environmentally friendly approach considering tomato as an intercrop in the organic Cabbage production was explored in this study. The experiment was conducted from November, 2010 to March 2011 during the minor cropping season on an experimental field near the Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi to evaluate the effectiveness of intercropping cabbage with tomato for pest control in organic cabbage production systems. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block design with five treatments and three replications (blocks). The treatments were sole tomato, sole cabbage, two rows of cabbage to one row of tomato, three rows of cabbage to one row of tomato and four rows of cabbage to one row of tomato. Parameters studied included insect pests’ numbers and their natural enemies. Major insect pest recorded included Brevicoryne brassicae, Plutella xylostella, Hellula undalis and Pieris rapae which caused damage to the cabbage plant (Brassica oleracae var. oxyllus). The natural enemies of pests of cabbage identified were the ladybird beetle, (Cheilomenes sp), huntsman spider, Heteropoda venotoria and black carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus. Data were taken on plant height, canopy spread, per cent head damage and weight of cabbage head at harvest. Results on the insect pest population showed significant differences. However, there was no significant difference (P = 0.3179) observed between the control cabbage and the cabbage-tomato intercrops. The results on the cabbage plants showed significant differences (p<0.05) in plant height, canopy spread, per cent head damage and weight of cabbage head at harvest. The study concluded that for better insect pest management and high productivity in organic cabbage production, two rows of cabbage to one row tomato among the treatments was the most appropriate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage-tomato intercrops did not differ significantly from sole cabbage in pest populations.

Treatment
cabbage-tomato intercropse0
Outcome
insect pest populatione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Value
P = 0.3179e0
Comparator
control cabbagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results on the insect pest population showed significant differences. However, there was no significant difference (P = 0.3179) observed between the control cabbage and the cabbage-tomato intercrops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1810 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage planting treatments differed significantly in height, canopy, head damage, and head weight.

Outcome
plant height, canopy spread, per cent head damagee0
Direction
significant differencese0
Value
p<0.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results on the cabbage plants showed significant differences (p<0.05) in plant height, canopy spread, per cent head damage and weight of cabbage head at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1976 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two cabbage rows per tomato row were judged most suitable for pest management and productivity.

Outcome
two rows of cabbage to one row tomatoe0
Direction
most appropriatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study concluded that for better insect pest management and high productivity in organic cabbage production, two rows of cabbage to one row tomato among the treatments was the most appropriate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2173 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.