Paper · 2008 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of crop establishment methods and irrigation schedules on economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) production, moisture depletion pattern, consumptive use and crop water-use efficiency

Rajendra Kumar Maurya; G. R. Singh

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2003-04 and 2004-05 at Kumarganj, Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of crop establishment method and irrigation schedule on water parameters and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) production. Highest net returns (Rs 14 965/ha) and net returns/rupee invested (Rs 1.03) were recorded under rota till drill against minimum value recorded under conventional (drill) method of crop establishment. The highest consumptive use (32.79 and 28.51 cm) was recorded under conventional (drill) method of crop establishment. While, water-use efficiency (131.38 and 173.88 kg/ha-cm) was highest under the bed planting. The highest consumptive use (33.91 and 28.49 cm) was recorded with 6 cm irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rota till drill gave the highest net returns, Rs 14 965/ha, relative to the minimum under conventional drill establishment.

Treatment
rota till drille0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
Rs 14 965/hae0
Comparator
conventional (drill) method of crop establishmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net returns (Rs 14 965/ha) and net returns/rupee invested (Rs 1.03) were recorded under rota till drill against minimum value recorded under conventional (drill) method of crop establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rota till drill gave the highest net returns per rupee invested, Rs 1.03, relative to the minimum under conventional drill establishment.

Treatment
rota till drille0
Outcome
net returns/rupee investede0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
Rs 1.03e0
Comparator
conventional (drill) method of crop establishmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net returns (Rs 14 965/ha) and net returns/rupee invested (Rs 1.03) were recorded under rota till drill against minimum value recorded under conventional (drill) method of crop establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional drill establishment had the highest consumptive water use, 32.79 and 28.51 cm.

Treatment
conventional (drill) method of crop establishmente0
Outcome
consumptive usee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.79 and 28.51 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest consumptive use (32.79 and 28.51 cm) was recorded under conventional (drill) method of crop establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting had the highest water-use efficiency, 131.38 and 173.88 kg/ha-cm.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
131.38 and 173.88 kg/ha-cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-use efficiency (131.38 and 173.88 kg/ha-cm) was highest under the bed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE gave the highest consumptive use, 33.91 and 28.49 cm.

Treatment
6 cm irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPEe0
Outcome
consumptive usee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
33.91 and 28.49 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest consumptive use (33.91 and 28.49 cm) was recorded with 6 cm irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.