Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Enhancing Yield and Water Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Through Sowing Methods and Irrigation Schedules under Light Textured Soil of Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Vikrant Singh R.K. Naresh; Ravindra Kumar Adesh Singh; U. P. Shahi Vivak Kumar; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Crop Research Centre of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture &Technology, Meerut (U.P.) during Rabi season of 2014-15 and 2015-16. To evaluate the effect of different tillage practices and irrigation scheduling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under light textured soil of western Uttar Pradesh. Five tillage crop establishment methods, viz. zero tillage (ZT)-T1, reduced tillage (RT)-T2, rotavator tillage (ROT)-T3, furrow irrigated raised bed tillage (FIRB)-T4, conventional tillage (ZT)-T5, were kept in main plots and five irrigation scheduling viz. Irrigation at CRI- I1, CRI+50 mm CPE- I2, CRI+100 mm CPE- I3, CRI+150 mm CPE- I4 and CRI+200 mm CPE- I5 were allotted to sub-plots in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. The result showed that productive tiller’s m-2, number of grain spike-1 and test weight were significantly higher with wheat sown on wide raised beds than all other tillage practices except zero tillage plots. Similarly furrow irrigated raised beds increased the mean grain yield of wheat significantly over rest of the plots and grain yield increased by and 38.4% over I1 and 6.4 % over I4 irrigation schedule. Treatments under zero tillage (T1) had about 3.4% higher average soil bulk density than T4 plots and T4 FIRB also recorded highest infiltration rate; reduced tillage, and FIRB recorded significantly lower soil penetration resistance as compared to zero and rotavator tillage treatments. The maximum gross income was significantly higher in wide raised beds plots. Similarly the highest mean net profit (Rs 45906 ha-1) with mean B: C ratio of 1.55 was recorded with the application of irrigations at CRI+100mm CPE in wheat crop. The results suggest that ZT with irrigations at CRI+100mm CPE and FIRB irrigations at CRI+50mm CPE were optimum and sustainable strategy to achieve higher yield and also to improve water productivity and profitability on light textured soil of western Uttar Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide raised beds increased productive tillers, grains per spike and test weight versus other tillage practices except zero tillage.

Treatment
wide raised bedse0
Outcome
productive tiller’s m-2, number of grain spike-1 and test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all other tillage practices except zero tillage plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productive tiller’s m-2, number of grain spike-1 and test weight were significantly higher with wheat sown on wide raised beds than all other tillage practices except zero tillage plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow irrigated raised beds significantly increased mean wheat grain yield over other plots.

Treatment
furrow irrigated raised bedse0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
rest of the plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow irrigated raised beds increased the mean grain yield of wheat significantly over rest of the plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased 38.4% over irrigation at CRI.

Treatment
CRI+100 mm CPEe3
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38.4%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield increased by and 38.4% over I1 and 6.4 % over I4 irrigation schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation at CRI- I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–624 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“CRI+100 mm CPE- I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased 6.4% over I4 irrigation schedule.

Treatment
CRI+100 mm CPEe3
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.4 %e0
Comparator
I4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield increased by and 38.4% over I1 and 6.4 % over I4 irrigation schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1190 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“CRI+100 mm CPE- I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had about 3.4% higher average soil bulk density than FIRB.

Treatment
zero tillage (T1)e0
Outcome
average soil bulk densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.4%e0
Comparator
T4 plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments under zero tillage (T1) had about 3.4% higher average soil bulk density than T4 plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB recorded the highest infiltration rate.

Treatment
T4 FIRBe0
Outcome
infiltration ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 FIRB also recorded highest infiltration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage and FIRB had significantly lower soil penetration resistance than zero and rotavator tillage.

Treatment
reduced tillage, and FIRBe0
Outcome
soil penetration resistancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
zero and rotavator tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced tillage, and FIRB recorded significantly lower soil penetration resistance as compared to zero and rotavator tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1477 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide raised bed plots had significantly higher maximum gross income.

Treatment
wide raised beds plotse0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross income was significantly higher in wide raised beds plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1554 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at CRI+100mm CPE produced the highest mean net profit of Rs 45906 ha-1.

Treatment
irrigations at CRI+100mm CPEe0
Outcome
mean net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 45906 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest mean net profit (Rs 45906 ha-1) with mean B: C ratio of 1.55 was recorded with the application of irrigations at CRI+100mm CPE in wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at CRI+100mm CPE produced a mean B:C ratio of 1.55.

Treatment
irrigations at CRI+100mm CPEe0
Outcome
mean B: C ratioe0
Value
1.55e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest mean net profit (Rs 45906 ha-1) with mean B: C ratio of 1.55 was recorded with the application of irrigations at CRI+100mm CPE in wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1718 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zero tillage with CRI+100mm CPE irrigation and FIRB with CRI+50mm CPE irrigation for yield, water productivity and profitability.

Outcome
optimum and sustainable strategy to achieve higher yield and also to improve water productivity and profitabilitye0
Setting
western Uttar Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with irrigations at CRI+100mm CPE and FIRB irrigations at CRI+50mm CPE were optimum and sustainable strategy to achieve higher yield and also to improve water productivity and profitability on light textured soil of western Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1985 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1718 · show in text ↑

irrigation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 51 positive, 28 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.