Paper · 2001 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of varying fertilization on yield of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum, aestivum) system and soil fertility status

Subhash Chandra; B.N. Ghosh; P. Singh; et al.

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Almora during 1994-99 to work out the fertilizer requirement of rice (Oryza saliva L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) system under irrigated conditions. Rice with recommended NPK (P as diammonium phosphate) and wheat with recommended NPK (P as single superphosphate) gave the highest grain yield during all the years. Application of only nitrogen was more detrimental to wheat than rice. Skipping P application drastically reduced the grain yield of wheat in the fourth year, but it did not hold true in case of rice. In the control treatment, rice gave almost 3 times more grain yield (2.67 tonnes/ha) than wheat (0.97 tonne/ha), but both had almost comparable yield level in the highest yield-producing treatments, i e NPK, P as diammonium phosphate in rice (4.71 tonnes/ha) and NPK, P as single superphosphate in wheat (4.92 tonnes/ha). Reducing the recommended fertilizer dose to half along with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) green-manuring recorded at par yield of rice with the recommended NPK. None of inorganic fertilizer treatments was capable of maintaining soil fertility except green-manuring with 100 or 50% of NPK.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK with diammonium phosphate gave rice the highest grain yield.

Treatment
recommended NPK (P as diammonium phosphate)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice with recommended NPK (P as diammonium phosphate) and wheat with recommended NPK (P as single superphosphate) gave the highest grain yield during all the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK with single superphosphate gave wheat the highest grain yield.

Treatment
recommended NPK (P as single superphosphate)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice with recommended NPK (P as diammonium phosphate) and wheat with recommended NPK (P as single superphosphate) gave the highest grain yield during all the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone was more detrimental to wheat than rice.

Treatment
only nitrogene0
Outcome
detrimentale0
Direction
more detrimentale0
Comparator
ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of only nitrogen was more detrimental to wheat than rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting P drastically reduced wheat grain yield in year four.

Treatment
Skipping P applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
drastically reducede0
Qualifier
fourth yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Skipping P application drastically reduced the grain yield of wheat in the fourth year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting P did not similarly reduce rice grain yield.

Treatment
Skipping P applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Skipping P application drastically reduced the grain yield of wheat in the fourth year, but it did not hold true in case of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control rice grain yield was 2.67 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
2.67 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the control treatment, rice gave almost 3 times more grain yield (2.67 tonnes/ha) than wheat (0.97 tonne/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–684 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control wheat grain yield was 0.97 tonne/ha.

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
0.97 tonne/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the control treatment, rice gave almost 3 times more grain yield (2.67 tonnes/ha) than wheat (0.97 tonne/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–684 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under NPK with diammonium phosphate was 4.71 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
NPK, P as diammonium phosphatee0
Outcome
ricee0
Value
4.71 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK, P as diammonium phosphate in rice (4.71 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield under NPK with single superphosphate was 4.92 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
NPK, P as single superphosphatee0
Outcome
wheate0
Value
4.92 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK, P as single superphosphate in wheat (4.92 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the recommended fertilizer dose plus sunnhemp green manuring gave rice yield at par with recommended NPK.

Treatment
Reducing the recommended fertilizer dose to half along with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) green-manuringe0
Interactor
sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.)Crotalaria junceae0other
Outcome
yield of ricee0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
recommended NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Crotalaria juncea
Crotalaria juncea · InteractorA16898 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing the recommended fertilizer dose to half along with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) green-manuring recorded at par yield of rice with the recommended NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only green manuring with 100 or 50% NPK maintained soil fertility.

Treatment
green-manuring with 100 or 50% of NPKe0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
maintaininge0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of inorganic fertilizer treatments was capable of maintaining soil fertility except green-manuring with 100 or 50% of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum, aestivum) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–97 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Diammonium phosphate produced the highest rice yield.

    Phosphorus Nutrition of Rice Grown in Fe-Toxic Acid Haplaquent · 1996 · compared with Purulia rock phosphate and superphosphate in conjunction with Mussoorie rock phosphate

    Same direction

  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Crotalaria juncea · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 419 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.